I had this argument with a liberal acquaintance recently, and she sent me a study from JAMA. Now, for context, I'd made the claim that no clinical trials of mRNA vaccines had every been performed on humans. This is the thing with liberals...you can't let them get you wrong on even the most irrelevant detail, or they'll gloat. The fact is, they did test these on humans, but this is also where you have to wind up explaining to someone what clinical trials are.
The trial took place for 2 months (Nov and Dec) last year, and these 60 days were supposed to comprise full Phase I-IV trials. That's a joke. It typically takes much, much longer to get through these things. Especially for a technology that's never been tested on humans prior to this, the idea they were deemed safe after 2 months is ludicrous. But for the liberal NPC, if the publication says the trials were completed, then that's that. In that person's mind, the authority said it, and so it is truth.
If we base the possibility for future adverse effects on the mice studies, we could expect these things to start causing problems months from now - possibly 6-12 months or something before we'd start seeing the effects.
I've got a feeling that there is going to be another 'health crisis' later this year. They won't blame it on vaccines, and they won't tolerate any of us blaming it on vaccines. You'll be labeled a conspiracy theorist and they'll point to the JAMA study to back them up. The fact will be that COVID was used to justify the vaccine, and the vaccine will be the true result of an actual health crisis. Still, it will be blamed on another pandemic cause, some microscopic enemy because that's the new form of terrorism for this decade (and perhaps longer).
That testimony is very interesting.
Yes, I am assuming that the trials in the US - since they were done in November and December, 2020 - were done after Warp Speed was authorized. But this is specifically what frustrates me about today's liberal mindset. It seems like the logical take on this would be, "Wow, that's a really short amount of time for something that's never been put in a human body before; on top of that, it had some serious side effects on mice."
Nope, it's "THERE WAS A TRIAL, REEEEEE!"
These people just want to be with the establishment so badly, which is to say they just want to beat you so bad they'll argue against their own interests and sound like complete morons (while still boasting that smug look like they're brilliant).
But for the liberal NPC, if the publication says the trials were completed, then that's that. In that person's mind, the authority said it, and so it is truth.
God damnit if that's not the truth. They read the "conclusions/results" section of a study and spout it as fact without even considering the methods or statistical analysis. I've seen dipshits parrot statistically-insignificant findings (p >0.05) as if they were proven-fact, never mind the bullshit methods.
For example, CDC is now saying 2 masks prevent transmission of covid by up to 96% in trials. What were the trials? They sprayed particles of KCl (potassium chloride) ranging in size from 0.1-7 μm at fucking dummies with masks on. So not only did they not spray particles similar in size of the virus (~20 nm, 1/5 the size of the smallest particle used in testing), but HOW DO YOU TEST TRANSMISSION TO A FUCKING DUMMY EVEN IF YOU'RE SPRAYING VIRAL PARTICLES LET ALONE SALT SPRAY!?!?
But yea... I still see assholes wearing two masks, showing me the meme of pissing on others without pants on vs. pissing with pants on as if liquids and aerosols are even close to comparable. My go-to reply is "oh yea I bet you think no one can smell your farts because you're wearing pants and underwear huh?"
Which is actually a great analogy for double masking. Fart particles are way bigger than covid aerosols.
(post is archived)