Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

OP's image is sneaky. The CDC and New Scientist links are sourced, but the bit about masks are sourced from

CHD is known for muddying the waters. Whether or not CHD is correct, normies and "just wear the fucking mask" zealots will find this and use it as further reason to dig their heels in and clamor for more hardcore muzzling of the population.

Basically, it's as though OP or whoever made the image did that deliberately as a discredit-by-association attack to give maskfags more ammunition to screech at anyone who refuses to wear the face diaper.

[–] • 0 pt

CHD is known for muddying the waters. Whether or not CHD is correct, normies and "just wear the fucking mask"

So your argument is "not a real source."

Thats the same argument the establishment and its supporters are going to make anyway.

further reason to dig their heels in and clamor for more hardcore muzzling of the population.

They're gonna do that anyway.

The answer isn't to argue with the unreasonable.

The answer is to refuse outright, and refuse to explain yourself.

[–] • 1 pt

While acknowledging the source legitimacy questions, the premise is intuitive. A mask is a semi-porous petri dish. That rag is going to be contaminated beyond belief in an hour or two. Yes, drs wear masks, but they don't even put them on themselves, and they don't cross contaminate environments.

Masks are anxiety pacifiers for retards and women

[–] • 0 pt

Pneumonia also happens when you sit around doing nothing. That's why old people die of it all the time. They can't get enough exercise or movement to get the fluid out of their lungs. Now that old people are all scared to leave the house, I'm very not surprised that this number is up.

[–] • 0 pt

Original links? Pls

[–] • 0 pt

Is quote real?

[–] • 1 pt

Not that i can find. The refs are about bacterial pneumonia but don't mention mask use as a cause.

[–] • 0 pt

Fuaci = charletton

[–] • 0 pt

it says aug 4 2008 but there is no new scientist issue on that specific date. they are all online, but i don’t really know if the article was memory holed.

[–] • 1 pt

Archive links to the original at the top of the page.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn14458-bacteria-were-the-real-killers-in-1918-flu-pandemic/

Just because there's no print issue doesn't mean they don't put articles on their site.

[–] • 0 pt

excellent research. if you google or even duck duck jew this article, you get a bunch of truth ministry shit denying it exists