Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

559

No one listened. They were too busy listening to faggots in the u.s. government working on sites like poal, voat, 4chan, etc, all saying "dont go its a setup! its an ambush by the police!"

We could have put their narrative in the ground before it took off.

But does anyone listen to GetCynical though? Nope.

You get the government you deserve.

No one listened. They were too busy listening to faggots in the u.s. government working on sites like poal, voat, 4chan, etc, all saying "dont go its a setup! its an ambush by the police!" We could have put their narrative in the ground before it took off. But does anyone listen to GetCynical though? Nope. You get the government you deserve.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (39).
[–] • 0 pt

It is not the way, never was, never will be.

I like you but we'll have to disagree.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

People rally behind strength, not victims.

Show some fucking capability, maybe you'll get somewhere.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

People rally behind strength, not victims.

Thats not the problem. You need to think beyond 'either/or' scenarios.

Show some fucking capability, maybe you'll get somewhere.

Legitimacy building is about capability, as an organization. The capability for reaching political goals. The state is the source of in effect infinite legitimacy/power/resources, and this is why the outnumbered communists always make their goals political in nature.

If you're not legitimate, people won't join. It's that simple.

The political will, and probably economic might, exists and is there to counter the u.s. government, but not with force.

It's not that the people who would don't exist. It's that theres a paradox:

  1. the people capable of force and willing to use it exist, and can be counted in the low single digit millions

  2. these people only want to join others, and only those they see as legitimate

  3. legitimacy is seen as non-violence, or peacemaking.

Theres the paradox.

I'm not a violent person anyway, and I basically assume anyone that talks about using force is larping and making a bad joke.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

>Legitimacy building is about capability, as an organization. The capability for reaching political goals.

You can talk all you want but you cannot achieve any political goals worth mentioning. Maybe you can get a new local dog catcher. lol

>The people capable of force and willing to use it exist, and can be counted in the low single digit millions, these people only want to join others, and only those they see as legitimate

True enough, they're victims of their own stupidity. I only want to know that you won't leave me hanging.

>I'm not a violent person anyway, and I basically assume anyone that talks about using force is larping and making a bad joke.

I've done things to people and animals that would make you cry. It was always effective.

You're all a bunch of pussy assed faggots, you deserve this shit. I just don't see how that should be my problem.