So, rather than revise 230 to remove protections for sites that actively manipulate content, thus becoming publishers, they’re opting to instead make any Internet forum they don’t like subject to penalties for any opposing trollfag to come along and post illegal content?
Shocking.
Yep it's so those faggots at SPLC can send their faggots to infiltrate and make places look bad. Two can play at that game.
Not sure how. The golden(stein) children never get their comeuppance.
The game is rigged so no they cant. The sites that have already seized power can censor like no one else. Then as always there will be special rules for special groups. There will also no doubt be ever more demands for your private information from them as a sign that they truly dont approve of you.
They want every second of everything you do recorded. That way they can fully snuff out any opposition in any way needed. Ideally before it ever exists. If it was easy enough to do they would record your every thought as well. Since it isnt for now the powers that be only advocate for literal brain scans.
I think there's been an impression that removing 230 protections would keep Big Tech from censoring conservatives. I don't see how. As we're looking at here, it seems this would only cause platforms to step up their censorship and make alternative platforms unable to operate.
The government should be going after Big Tech for monopoly abuse; no new laws needed. They actively purchase competitors and collude to lock out any new platforms from revenue and even the resources to operate. Shit, Google owns the way a majority of sites make revenue. If the government hasn't the stones to enforce the laws we've got, I don't see how new ones are going to help. The branch of government that's supposed to do that is The Executive; I understand it's been hard to get a good one with the election cheating, which is why it all comes back to "no political solution" I suppose.
(post is archived)