I endorse this message However, this >>All the Qtards admit it they were duped I'm not so sure... We're dealing with ex junkies here, sort of... People who trained their brain for a long period of time in a very particular way, through peer validation and peer pressure... People who were literally high and dependent/hooked on a particular set of beliefs Relapse is a thing, if anything that's what I'm saying It's not a minor issue for themselves, first and foremost, it's kind of like a cult survivor issue. It takes time to fully recover from exposure to deception over a prolonged period of time. And the core of the problem, is **why did they fell for it in the first place?** While others like me for instance, didn't buy into it, like not at all, there was something repulsive to me in there, from the get go (I hate wishful thinking, it's tantamount to underestimating your adversary) And I tried to get convinced, I was like, give me your best shot, I'm willing to listen ... That's the real question. And that's something we can eventually help with, but ultimately it's up to them to change their way of thinking. As a matter of fact, a fatal flaw in their psyche, has been exploited IMO, the common denominator between Qbelievers, is an unhealthy mix of wishful thinking and poor standards of proof, to begin with. Needless to mention an inclination for herd behavior Also, I suspect a set of "dog whistle" tactics has been used against them, and for many of them this is what triggered acceptance of what they shouldn't have accepted. Dog whistle tactics specifically targeting christians, to be more accurate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_whistle_(politics) >>In politics, a dog whistle is **the use of coded or suggestive language in political messaging to garner support from a particular group** without provoking opposition. The concept is named for ultrasonic dog whistles used in shepherding.