WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.1K

They know there are better drugs than vaccines for this virus, they don't care.

This video keeps getting removed from youtube. Synopsis of video (medicalkidnap.com)

Ivermectin dosing guide. (files.catbox.moe) I'm not a doctor people, do your own research.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivermectin

They know there are better drugs than vaccines for this virus, they don't care. This video keeps getting removed from youtube. [ Synopsis of video](https://medicalkidnap.com/2020/12/09/i-cant-keep-watching-patients-die-needlessly-medical-professor-testifies-to-congress-that-covid-cure-already-exists-with-ivermectin/) [ Ivermectin dosing guide.](https://files.catbox.moe/ze7m3n.pdf) I'm not a doctor people, do your own research. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivermectin

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

LOL everyone already knows there are papers claiming to have isolated and sequenced a virus. Your linking to those papers doesn’t change that it’s pseudoscience. Obviously there has to be a cover story. You think there is going to be a fake pandemic without a “scientific paper” or two that seem to identify a new virus?

All of those claims have been debunked and many institutions INCLUDING THE CDC have admitted they never had an isolated bullshit virus.

You’re just repeating the pseudoscientific definitions of “isolated” and “sequenced” as if they hinge on actual scientific observation, which they do not.

https://thefreedomarticles.com/10-reasons-sars-cov-2-imaginary-digital-theoretical-virus/

https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/09/scientists-have-utterly-failed-to-prove-that-the-coronavirus-fulfills-kochs-postulates/

[–] 0 pt

From the "off-guardian" blog that you linked (the authors of which apparently don't know the difference between a microbe and a virus, and had to be corrected on DNA vs RNA):

We’ve scoured the internet and found no proof that scientists have done the simple steps required to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 conclusively meets even one – never mind all — of the third postulate’s constituent parts. Those parts are:

  • isolation from a human patient’s cells of full-length novel-coronavirus DNA*

  • sequencing of the isolated DNA, then determining that the identical sequence is not present in any other virus, and next replicating or cloning the DNA to form a new copy of the virus

  • injecting the new copy of the virus into a statistically significant number of living hosts (usually lab animals) and seeing whether those animals develop the discrete diagnostic symptoms associated with COVID-19 rather than developing the diagnostic symptoms of any other infection or disease.

The article I linked meets every single one of those "requirements". The sample is taken from a human. The virus is fully sequenced. The virus is isolated. It is transferred to living Vero (animal) cells. The virus successfully infects the cells and replicates. It even includes an electron image of the actual virus, as it's infecting a cell and replicating.

If all that is not enough for you then nothing ever will be. So stop pretending your objections have anything to do with evidence provided.

I bet you think the Earth is flat, too.

Believe in your fantasies and little green men all you like. But stop acting like your delusions represent science or any remotely honest attempt at empirically determining what is real and what isn't. You don't give a shit about what is real, or objective observation. You just want to stroke your ego, by cherry-picking whatever makes you feel like your every first guess about everything has been right all along, and ignoring anything that would require you to reevaluate your baseless assumptions.

Not content with merely being utterly useless, and lacking the ability to provide anything of value yourself, you instead try to make yourself feel relevant by loudly and obnoxiously interfering with those who are everything you are not, and who do everything you cannot. Exactly like the NPCs on the Left.

People like you are vermin.

[–] 0 pt

Yep, I knew you must also be a globetard.

FYI, people who are unconvinced of the existence of Covid already know there are scientific papers claiming to have sequenced and isolated it. Linking to these claims doesn’t prove anything. It’s not transparent, demonstrable, repeatable, or observable. Obviously faking a pandemic would necessitate producing claims like this, written in opaque jargon, for it to have a chance of working at alll. Believing these claims on their face is not a scientific belief at all, in fact it’s just pseudoscience.

Unless you want to highlight specifically in this paper where any of their claims or observations are actually demonstrated.

If you could demonstrate any of this and not simply appeal to authority, by linking to other people’s “work,” you would simply be able to do so and not spend half your comment personally attacking me.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

FYI, people who are unconvinced of the existence of Covid already know there are scientific papers claiming to have sequenced and isolated it. Linking to these claims doesn’t prove anything.

Anticlutch literally asked to see a picture of the virus, implying no such thing exists. So I showed him one and linked to the source.

He asked. I provided. Others appreciated. You butt in to whine about it. Go be useless somewhere else.

Don't forget to always keep yourself tied to a tree. Because gravity is just a theory. Never know when it might cut out.