WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

They know there are better drugs than vaccines for this virus, they don't care.

This video keeps getting removed from youtube. Synopsis of video (medicalkidnap.com)

Ivermectin dosing guide. (files.catbox.moe) I'm not a doctor people, do your own research.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivermectin

They know there are better drugs than vaccines for this virus, they don't care. This video keeps getting removed from youtube. [ Synopsis of video](https://medicalkidnap.com/2020/12/09/i-cant-keep-watching-patients-die-needlessly-medical-professor-testifies-to-congress-that-covid-cure-already-exists-with-ivermectin/) [ Ivermectin dosing guide.](https://files.catbox.moe/ze7m3n.pdf) I'm not a doctor people, do your own research. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivermectin

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

FYI, people who are unconvinced of the existence of Covid already know there are scientific papers claiming to have sequenced and isolated it. Linking to these claims doesn’t prove anything.

Anticlutch literally asked to see a picture of the virus, implying no such thing exists. So I showed him one and linked to the source.

He asked. I provided. Others appreciated. You butt in to whine about it. Go be useless somewhere else.

Don't forget to always keep yourself tied to a tree. Because gravity is just a theory. Never know when it might cut out.

[–] 0 pt

You linked to a picture that claims to be a picture of a specific virus. That’s called appeal to authority. The process by which that picture came into your view is entirely unknown to you and me, deliberately so.

Do you honestly think, supposing for a moment it is possible that the virus is made up, there wouldn’t be supposed pictures? Does the picture you refer to look like an exosome? Has it been replicated in full view in real time from another sample from a positive patient, over and over again, I’m the repeatable fashion of science?

Have you thought critically about this for just one minute? Some people have.

[–] 0 pt

Are you actually serious?

This is such blatant sophistry, I have a hard time imagining anyone is stupid enough to mistake it for "thinking critically".

All pictures "claim" to be pictures of something. Such is the nature of pictures. When you ask someone for a picture, that is the best you can hope to get. Even if I took the picture myself, using the electron microscope in my garage, you could use the same sort of "reasoning" to claim I faked it. Go do it yourself then.

Except you can't. Because you're useless. All you can do is whine, and interfere, and demand, and complain that it's never enough. Just like the environ-mental-tards and their SJW brethren. You contribute nothing, and complain about everything. Go be useless somewhere else, you complete waste of time and space.

[–] 0 pt

LOL @ crying sophistry while waxing philosophical on the nature of pictures instead of just providing evidence of a new unique infectious virus from China.