WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

310

They know there are better drugs than vaccines for this virus, they don't care.

This video keeps getting removed from youtube. Synopsis of video (medicalkidnap.com)

Ivermectin dosing guide. (files.catbox.moe) I'm not a doctor people, do your own research.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivermectin

They know there are better drugs than vaccines for this virus, they don't care. This video keeps getting removed from youtube. [ Synopsis of video](https://medicalkidnap.com/2020/12/09/i-cant-keep-watching-patients-die-needlessly-medical-professor-testifies-to-congress-that-covid-cure-already-exists-with-ivermectin/) [ Ivermectin dosing guide.](https://files.catbox.moe/ze7m3n.pdf) I'm not a doctor people, do your own research. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivermectin

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

All you say is of course correct, but it has not been isolated according to the CDC this summer 2020.

I dont want to nitpick , but uneducated anticlutch is correct about the strange lazy oddity of the sars-2 virus never yet being isolated on its own, though its broken up parts are sequenced fully and its assumed to be just another relative of sars-1 coronavirus so the effort of isolating it is just a pedantic task.

Also it does not change the fact that the virus can only be obtained by researchers in a slurry matrix from lab bred varvet simians... .. or on a growth medium tested for viral payload before shipment. in both cases the samples include hundreds of unwanted bacteria strains, other virus, virus and bacterial encapsulated "spores", fragments of past lysed and broken microbiotics, fungi, even fragments of material from single celled parasites fractured when strained through a ceramic filter prior.

luckily and happily trace zinc is in lab growth culture so the drugs (HCQ) that are 99% efficacy in vivo (dying patients) is the same 99% efficacy in vitro too , just as papers from 2005 for sars-2. This shocking 2020 paper revealed first in vitro growth and suppression via HCQ in human dose concentration, and efficacy measured in triplicate and by three lab teams (nine full reproductions) :

Andreani - Didier Raoult : 2020.04.17 - In Vitro Testing of Combined Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin on Sars-Cov-2 Shows Synergistic Effect

https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Andreani-et-al.-preprintV2.pdf

that paper details specifically the type of soup used to feed the virus being studied for the drug.

in summary... unlike all other human pathogens... the CDC never has yet made available a vial of the pure ISOLATED sars-2.

"It is not isolated yet", and CDC web site used that exact typed phrase one time I looked.

shotgun sequencing of it is trivial because its a single strand virus and the thing is a coronavirus and specifically a sars coronavirus, so its easy to locate among all the garbage floating loose around it... but its still not an isolate.

Anticlutch is a uneducated fool though

Anticlutch thinks ultraviolet microscopes in expensive private high schools can photograph sars-2 ! Proof of Anticlutch retardation here: https://files.catbox.moe/ctpvms.jpg

[–] 1 pt

but uneducated anticlutch is correct about the strange lazy oddity of the sars-2 virus never yet being isolated on its own

This is not correct either. It was fully isolated in S. Korea as far back as February of last year, and earlier in other countries.

See here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045880/

Methods

Upper and lower respiratory tract secretion samples from putative patients with COVID-19 were inoculated onto cells to isolate the virus. Full genome sequencing and electron microscopy were used to identify the virus.

Results

The virus replicated in Vero cells and cytopathic effects were observed. Full genome sequencing showed that the virus genome exhibited sequence homology of more than 99.9% with SARS-CoV-2 which was isolated from patients from other countries, for instance China. Sequence homology of SARS-CoV-2 with SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV was 77.5% and 50%, respectively. Coronavirus-specific morphology was observed by electron microscopy in virus-infected Vero cells.

Conclusion

SARS-CoV-2 was isolated from putative patients with unexplained pneumonia and intermittent coughing and fever. The isolated virus was named BetaCoV/Korea/KCDC03/2020.

"Broken up parts" of the virus would not successfully replicate in Vero cells.

Further down you will find more details about how it was isolated, and even the pictures @Anticlutch asked for:

Figure 2: Electron Micrographs of Vero cells infected with SARS-CoV-2 (files.catbox.moe)

The "not isolated" and "just a simulation" narratives are misinformed nonsense at best. Deliberate disinfo at worst.

[–] 1 pt

LOL everyone already knows there are papers claiming to have isolated and sequenced a virus. Your linking to those papers doesn’t change that it’s pseudoscience. Obviously there has to be a cover story. You think there is going to be a fake pandemic without a “scientific paper” or two that seem to identify a new virus?

All of those claims have been debunked and many institutions INCLUDING THE CDC have admitted they never had an isolated bullshit virus.

You’re just repeating the pseudoscientific definitions of “isolated” and “sequenced” as if they hinge on actual scientific observation, which they do not.

https://thefreedomarticles.com/10-reasons-sars-cov-2-imaginary-digital-theoretical-virus/

https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/09/scientists-have-utterly-failed-to-prove-that-the-coronavirus-fulfills-kochs-postulates/

[–] 0 pt

From the "off-guardian" blog that you linked (the authors of which apparently don't know the difference between a microbe and a virus, and had to be corrected on DNA vs RNA):

We’ve scoured the internet and found no proof that scientists have done the simple steps required to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 conclusively meets even one – never mind all — of the third postulate’s constituent parts. Those parts are:

  • isolation from a human patient’s cells of full-length novel-coronavirus DNA*

  • sequencing of the isolated DNA, then determining that the identical sequence is not present in any other virus, and next replicating or cloning the DNA to form a new copy of the virus

  • injecting the new copy of the virus into a statistically significant number of living hosts (usually lab animals) and seeing whether those animals develop the discrete diagnostic symptoms associated with COVID-19 rather than developing the diagnostic symptoms of any other infection or disease.

The article I linked meets every single one of those "requirements". The sample is taken from a human. The virus is fully sequenced. The virus is isolated. It is transferred to living Vero (animal) cells. The virus successfully infects the cells and replicates. It even includes an electron image of the actual virus, as it's infecting a cell and replicating.

If all that is not enough for you then nothing ever will be. So stop pretending your objections have anything to do with evidence provided.

I bet you think the Earth is flat, too.

Believe in your fantasies and little green men all you like. But stop acting like your delusions represent science or any remotely honest attempt at empirically determining what is real and what isn't. You don't give a shit about what is real, or objective observation. You just want to stroke your ego, by cherry-picking whatever makes you feel like your every first guess about everything has been right all along, and ignoring anything that would require you to reevaluate your baseless assumptions.

Not content with merely being utterly useless, and lacking the ability to provide anything of value yourself, you instead try to make yourself feel relevant by loudly and obnoxiously interfering with those who are everything you are not, and who do everything you cannot. Exactly like the NPCs on the Left.

People like you are vermin.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

The CDC own web page claimed it is NOT isolated. You posted merely info that the whol virus can be moved from one culture of cells to another , along with lots of other microbes and microbe fragments.

SARS-2 the last time I checked in mid summer was mysteriously NOT available as a single virus culture for ANY researchers on earth from ANY lab.

photos of candidates of coronavirus sars-2 do match up with protein models, but unless taken from a proven sol-virus pure isolate with no extra genetic matter of any form , the photo cannot ever factualy be claimed as over 99.9% probable.

It is a FACT, a true FACT that the CDC mentioned this themselves and I read it with my own eyes.

I know more about this covid-19 coronavirus than anyone you will ever meet other than a virologist with a namne on a published sars-2 paper.

I announced HCQHydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin to internet mere days after the first discovery in france :

https://searchvoat.co/v/science/3715659

see!? The fbi gave that negative 88 votes instantly , the most suppressed post in history of VOAT!! An I did that all.

After I revealed HCQ on voat in that link ...

after I posted that https://searchvoat.co/v/science/3715659 on voat.co :

Styxhexenhammer666 mentioned it ! :

https://www.youtube.com/user/Styxhexenhammer666/videos

https://www.invidio.us/channel/Styxhexenhammer666

Stefan Molyneux mentioned it ! (in middle of this long video) :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5rzIIROuWwYouTube

https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=a5rzIIROuWw

Ann Coulter column mentioned it ! [website DDOSed instantly by feds] :

https://www.anncoulter.com/

i did far more than that link.

I leaked non-yet-embargoed pre-pre release papers on Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin hours after they were fully ready to reveal

I revealed research into other safe zinc ionophores with the SAME EXACT EFFICACY as HCQ, complete with links, in case banned HCQ unavailable. I even posted predicting HCQ would get banned and seized by feds BEFORE IT WAS BANNED.

I did a lot more to save lives but I dont want to dox myself any more.

I predicted Hydroxychloroquine would get banned and I was right. 5 states banned it, then the feds.

I was also the first person on the internet to post a link to this 2005 CDC funded paper : DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69 on HCQ and sars 90% efficacy as seen in that voat thread link from 11 months ago :

https://searchvoat.co/v/science/3715659/23006654

hah! That revelation to that paper spun into the millions of people memeing "Fauci lied, he knew in 2005 about HCQ"

I SAVED THOUSANDS OF LIVES

But I will no longer participate on poal in a meaningful way. I just got banned here on paol today and lost 300 vote credits and admins tampered with votes to ban me. So fuck this censoring cesspool. I hate mod and admin censorship.

This site is now no different that twitter or facebook.

[–] 0 pt

That's a whole lot of stroking your ego. Might need a NSFW tag if you keep going like that.

A link to back up your claim that CDC said the virus has never been isolated would have been far more convincing and useful.

Fact is I provided a paper that shows, and provides evidence, that the virus has been isolated. They weren't the first or last to do it either.

If you wish to continue believing in your personal little cult religion about how amazing and flawless you are, that's your business.