Except all of these companies have claimed liability protections under article 230, which makes them a public forum.
A private company has the right to do or not do anything, which would make desantis' stand untenable, but these companies have voluntarily waived those rights by claiming to be protected through article 230. This legally and constitutionally puts them in the purview of public forum, public access, and freedom of speech protection for the people using them, not the companies anymore. This article doesn't understand law or legality and apparently neither do you.
Except all of these companies have claimed liability protections under article 230, which makes them a public forum.
A private company has the right to do or not do anything, which would make desantis' stand untenable, but these companies have voluntarily waived those rights by claiming to be protected through article 230. This legally and constitutionally puts them in the purview of public forum, public access, and freedom of speech protection for the people using them, not the companies anymore. This article doesn't understand law or legality and apparently neither do you.
(post is archived)