WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

370

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

says the best legal mind in the universe.

[–] 0 pt

strawman

Congrats, admitted paid jewish shill. We have two and a half centuries of precedent that prove you wrong.

[–] 0 pt

Which precedent?

[–] 0 pt

“The Constitution for these United States is the Supreme Law of the Land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law and effect from its inception.” ~ Marbury v. Madison; 1803

“Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common right and common reason are null and void.” ~ Bennett v. Boggs; 1830

“A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by Federal constitution.” ~ Murdock v. Pennsylvania; 1943

“The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.” ~ Miller v. US; 1956

“If a State converts a liberty into a privilege the citizen can engage in the right with impunity.” ~ Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham; 1963

“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional rights.” ~ Sherer v. Cullen; 1973

And then specifically applied regarding . A private corporation which creates a platform for public use REVOKES ITS RIGHT (as though it were private property) TO CENSOR ON SAID PLATFORM.