WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

The phrase well regulated militia is in there. Sure the founders put that in there to allow free gun owners to organize, train, and store weapons in large groups. But hey its 2020, well regulated militia can just be reinterpreted as all guns will be well regulated by the state. living breathing document and all.

[–] [deleted] 5 pts (edited )

Right to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

And a "well" regulated militia, isnt one regulated by tyrants.

[–] 2 pts

It says the militia is well regulated, not guns.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

This is where i think the founders fucked up. They should have left it as the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Almost every single anti gun laws has used the first part of the 2A clause to take away rights by reinterpreting what a militia is and who owns that militia

[–] 1 pt

It doesn't matter. They can stretch it however they want anyway. Look at the First Amendment that says Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech. That's pretty straightforward, and yet...

Other mistakes the 19th Amendment.

[–] 0 pt

I used to interpret that part so the militia suppliers knew what ammo each militia needed. Knowing there's people that have tens of thousands of rounds of ammo, that seems silly.