WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Oh.

Well that sounds demonstrably valid.

I was thinking of Reagan's apparent founding of neocon bullshittery, while doing enough good to keep his audiences reasonably pleased.

[–] 1 pt

I just wish I’d known about William Luther Pierce at the time, but I’d never heard of him.

[–] 1 pt

Fuck, that guy got SO slandered.

Oh, look, he still is! Fucking kikeniggers.

But how could you have heard of him at the time? I was just a kid then, so therefore I have decided so were you!

[–] 1 pt

That’s legit - Reagan in the top spot certainly let them down the rosy path to the Uniparty, but in those days American Evangelicals had significant influence in the actual direction of the GOP which - despite being irritatingly shallow and unintelligent, was markedly different from the Democrats.

There was also an assumed nationalism, with an ethnic undercurrent by virtue of sheer numbers. But they all gradually died out and were replaced with zionist neocons - thanks largely to that aforementioned Evangelical influence.

[–] 1 pt

Dumb as fuck how that worked out, but a spot on assessment on your part.