You argue that racial disparities in police encounters are a sign of bias, but you've offered no evidence that is the case. There are many explanations that do not involve bias or racism. In other words, there are many null hypotheses and only one alternative hypothesis. You're going to have to show your work on how you rejected all of the null hypotheses.
You argue that racial disparities in police encounters are a sign of bias, but you've offered no evidence that is the case. There are many explanations that do not involve bias or racism. In other words, there are many null hypotheses and only one alternative hypothesis. You're going to have to show your work on how you rejected all of the null hypotheses.
(post is archived)