WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] 12 pts

Looks just like... I dunno.. voting statistics from certain states?

[–] 3 pts

I wonder where they got the idea?

[–] [deleted] 9 pts

Imagine being such an insecure pussy fart that you literally use the government and their army of technocrats to remove dislikes from your social media account and force people to follow you. My wife was forced to follow the white house on instagram and there were pages of people saying "why the fuck can't I unsubscribe or block these dicks?". Every teenage girl is green with envy

[–] [deleted] 5 pts

and all it does is give anti-jew people vast sums of credibility.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Why was she forced to follow?

[–] 2 pts

Because no one was willingly following. You can't have the guy that (((won))) 80 million votes not have a significant number of (((social media))) "followers" now can you?

I meant who is forcing her? Why can't she press the unfollow button.

[–] 7 pts

Oh this is fantastic!

[–] 6 pts

Underrated post.

[–] 4 pts
[–] 0 pt

This clearer for normals too.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

I have been saying this for a long time: This is advertising fraud. Joogletoob sells ads based upon view counts and other metrics that are provably fraudulent. Same thing goes for Twatter and Faceberg.

[–] 1 pt

for those interested, i wrote a short piece about this data and compared it to the WH videos on bitchute: Blatant YouTube vote manipulation for White House channel (12bytes.org)

[–] 0 pt

Eventually they'll go the Wokeflix way and get rid of up/down thumbs and then comments.

[–] 0 pt

+1 for using gnuplot

[–] 0 pt

Are those unique or the same person downing it multiple times? I wouldn't be surprised if they are removing people's dislikes and that person goes back and dislikes it again.

Load more (8 replies)