Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

382

Spend the next 4 years planning all while getting in the best physical shape possible for a man his age. Slim up and pack on muscle.

This will gain him a lot of respect and trigger the living shit out of his haters. It would be something completely unexpected of him.

Then he should run as an independent in 2024.

Being a powerful man is a full package. You need to look the part physically.

Spend the next 4 years planning all while getting in the best physical shape possible for a man his age. Slim up and pack on muscle. This will gain him a lot of respect and trigger the living shit out of his haters. It would be something completely unexpected of him. Then he should run as an independent in 2024. Being a powerful man is a full package. You need to look the part physically.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (51).
[–] • 0 pt

I specifically watched the same questions I presented here be asked over and over in those depositions. I can link you to the videos. They were literally asked over and over who were these people who had their votes switched? How was the software manipulated so on and so forth. You shouldn't get upset with me for asking these question. All I want is truth and I think the truth is there was some small anomalies but no widespread election fraud. Maybe there was but they sure didn't argue the case very well or present any real evidence

[–] • 1 pt

This was the problem with the courts.

1) Votes are supposed to be anonymous. This is an aspect that might need to be changed, but for right now, nobody should be able to be tracked back to their vote.

So pointing out who had their votes switched is systematically and mechanically impossible.

Those fucking niggers that tore up trump ballots? Nobody had their name on them. Who where those niggers? Was that video ever verified? I didn't pay attention.

2) Who wrote the software? There should be a paper trail for that. The problem is diving deep enough to find out. The offices were closed and the units dissolved, correct? And operated in other countries? How do you propose to find the source code?

Suppose the source code isn't at fault, but there is a "feature" that allows setting/inputting different race factors? Sure, that is a coded feature, but is only used for "testing", but everyone knows how to "test" it.

There is no doubt the election was stolen. There is no fucking way a guy that only has 8 "people" at a rally could beat the man who draws crowds for days.

The problem facing the court is the same as it ever is - there is no person to find with standing that could show material evidence that "overturned" the election. It is more a procedural issue than an evidence issue.

I have yet to see a single court case solved by "statistical" evidence that went against the kikes.

[–] • 0 pt

None of this changes the fact that no real evidence was presented. They couldn't do anything with what was presented. I'm not on anybody's side here, I'm just calling it how it is.

[–] • 0 pt

You are correct and wrong at the same time.

Signed affidavits - sworn testimony to a court - is evidence. Making false testimonies can lead to jail time. Every signed affidavit is "evidence".

What the court couldn't do was to make a ruling based on the evidence presented because the legal filing either didn't have standing, or wasn't filed properly.

Of all the cases filed, none of the evidence was heard because procedural issues got the cases thrown out before any evidentiary stage.

My walmart example stands. There was no way for a court to even start a trial because the cases were procedurally moot.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Did you watch the coffee county video? You would know what I'm talking about if you did. It's a simple question. You asked me to give you answers...I'm trying. Did you watch the coffee county video?