Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.0K

Spend the next 4 years planning all while getting in the best physical shape possible for a man his age. Slim up and pack on muscle.

This will gain him a lot of respect and trigger the living shit out of his haters. It would be something completely unexpected of him.

Then he should run as an independent in 2024.

Being a powerful man is a full package. You need to look the part physically.

Spend the next 4 years planning all while getting in the best physical shape possible for a man his age. Slim up and pack on muscle. This will gain him a lot of respect and trigger the living shit out of his haters. It would be something completely unexpected of him. Then he should run as an independent in 2024. Being a powerful man is a full package. You need to look the part physically.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (51).
[–] • 0 pt

Can you refute anything I said then? I'm asking sincerely, what evidence was presented outside of accusations?

They refused to name any names of people who had their votes switched.

They refused to name any names of underage voters.

They could not present any evidence of software being manipulated.

Honestly what am I missing? If it's so apparent you should easily be able to tell me something

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

THEY WERE NOT ALLOWED TO PRESENT THE EVIDENCE TO A COURT.

Most of the courts used the ruling 12B6 BEFORE the cases were allowed to go to discovery. But there is still plenty of evidence, even if the courts wouldnt review it.

Okay...let's do this one at a time.

Did you watch the Coffee County video?

[–] • 0 pt

I specifically watched the same questions I presented here be asked over and over in those depositions. I can link you to the videos. They were literally asked over and over who were these people who had their votes switched? How was the software manipulated so on and so forth. You shouldn't get upset with me for asking these question. All I want is truth and I think the truth is there was some small anomalies but no widespread election fraud. Maybe there was but they sure didn't argue the case very well or present any real evidence

[–] • 1 pt

This was the problem with the courts.

1) Votes are supposed to be anonymous. This is an aspect that might need to be changed, but for right now, nobody should be able to be tracked back to their vote.

So pointing out who had their votes switched is systematically and mechanically impossible.

Those fucking niggers that tore up trump ballots? Nobody had their name on them. Who where those niggers? Was that video ever verified? I didn't pay attention.

2) Who wrote the software? There should be a paper trail for that. The problem is diving deep enough to find out. The offices were closed and the units dissolved, correct? And operated in other countries? How do you propose to find the source code?

Suppose the source code isn't at fault, but there is a "feature" that allows setting/inputting different race factors? Sure, that is a coded feature, but is only used for "testing", but everyone knows how to "test" it.

There is no doubt the election was stolen. There is no fucking way a guy that only has 8 "people" at a rally could beat the man who draws crowds for days.

The problem facing the court is the same as it ever is - there is no person to find with standing that could show material evidence that "overturned" the election. It is more a procedural issue than an evidence issue.

I have yet to see a single court case solved by "statistical" evidence that went against the kikes.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Did you watch the coffee county video? You would know what I'm talking about if you did. It's a simple question. You asked me to give you answers...I'm trying. Did you watch the coffee county video?