WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

No sorry, it's too far fetched

A much more likely explanation is that he did work for the FBI as an informant, and some partisan fucks within the legal system transmitted the information to some other partisan fucks working at reuters in order to cast doubt on his integrity within the proud boys organization

Now it doesn't mean he snitched on the proud boys, but that's enough to ruin his reputation within the organization, and it's 100% legal. Low and unfair, but 100% legal and no one needs to risk to go to jail

That, is much, much, much more likely

Occam's razor

>"I don't recall any of this"

lol, dead give away

[–] 0 pt

lol, dead give away

So him denying defamation amounts to an admission of guilt?

You realize thats the same standard the left uses against everyone right?

[–] 0 pt

He's not denying anything

He's said he doesn't recall...

Right.