>No, just suspect one judge.
Potentially 20 years for a judge, and end of career evidently, for? For the leader of what's basically a soft hooligan club of trump supporters?
You do realize that people actually went to jail, like dozens following the snitching? Which implies that the judge falsified something like thousands of court documents?
...
For what again? What's the benefit here? Proud boys are a side show politically speaking
It doesn't make sense, and it wouldn't even end the proud boys, it would just end one leader....
Potentially 20 years for a judge, and end of career evidently, for?
Only if theres anyone who will enforce that law.
And there isn't.
For what again? What's the benefit here? Proud boys are a side show politically speaking
They take down another organization.
Thats the entire point. Nothing and no one period, can be allowed to show the american people, at all ever, that we are not outnumbered. That we are in fact the majority.
If that ever happens their game is over.
No sorry, it's too far fetched
A much more likely explanation is that he did work for the FBI as an informant, and some partisan fucks within the legal system transmitted the information to some other partisan fucks working at reuters in order to cast doubt on his integrity within the proud boys organization
Now it doesn't mean he snitched on the proud boys, but that's enough to ruin his reputation within the organization, and it's 100% legal. Low and unfair, but 100% legal and no one needs to risk to go to jail
That, is much, much, much more likely
Occam's razor
>"I don't recall any of this"
lol, dead give away
lol, dead give away
So him denying defamation amounts to an admission of guilt?
You realize thats the same standard the left uses against everyone right?
(post is archived)