I would say her advocacy for freedom and freedom of speech would make her an Advocate for Freedom. The reason she's in the news is because she is against Twitter and Facebook for their attack on the freedom of speech. Ya know why we are here right now.
I'm open to hear why I shouldn't support her, but everything she's been saying makes sense. Moreso than the these reasons.
Tell me when she supports allowing people to name the jew on Twitter.
She's not for free speech, she's just against blatant,rampant, unapologetic censorship. Better than nothing? No. Same as nothing. But with more words.
Did you read the fucking article? https://saraacarter.com/tulsi-gabbard-claims-schiff-brennan-big-tech-turning-u-s-into-a-police-state/
Start there.
But let us be clear, the John Brennan's, Adam Schiffs and the oligarchs in Big Tech who are… pic.twitter.com/Q3VssCiz5l Son, thats naming jews. What the fuck you want?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0hR7wb8X48
Take a peek at that. Again, I am open, but I just gave you three instances where she separates herself from the rest of the politicians. And lets be clear. They are STILL politicians. You need to counter with actual facts because currently you're just spouting someone else opinion and that's sad.
Ok, I give. She's better than the cabal.
(post is archived)