WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

686

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

They're going to take video footage of women in fatigues who were directed and kept alive by men, and use that as evidence to argue that women are the same as men.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Women in the US military is a huge deception to weaken and perhaps even destroy the military. If you look at countries that have women in their military, its because of the lack of resources. Every man and woman is needed. Some of these same countries use(d) children to fight in their war(s). Of course, the MSM won't ever tell you this.

Our 'experiment' in the US military forces has not been successful at all. The list of compromises is long and far out weigh the benefit. One only needs to do their own research to quickly find how detrimental it really is with women in active combat roles.

As I was writing this, I noticed that the vast majority of these original links have disappeared. Archive.org is becoming absolutely useless. I'm forced to print out some of what I have collected over the years. I'm absolutely convinced the enemy is already 'within our gate' and is trying to destroy the United States by pushing this social engineering BS. It doesn't stop here with allowing women in the active military forces. Right away, we are witnessing their plan of destroying our great military with their puppet president signing EOs for allowing transgenders to be in the US military. It's so obvious to what they are attempting to do. Any way, here is some of the issues of women being in the military:

Prevalence of neurosis (hysteria) in women, in its colloquial use, describes unmanageable emotional excesses. People who are "hysterical" often lose self-control due to an overwhelming fear that may be caused by multiple events in one's past that involved some sort of severe conflict; the fear can be centered on a body part, or, most commonly, on an imagined problem with that body part. One passage recommends pregnancy to cure such symptoms, ostensibly because intercourse will "moisten" the womb and facilitate blood circulation within the body. By the mid to late 19th century, hysteria (or sometimes female hysteria) came to refer to what is today generally considered to be sexual dysfunction.[2] Typical treatment was massage of the patient's genitalia by the physician and, later, by vibrators or water sprays to cause orgasm.

Estrogen Affects Brain Activity In Postmenopausal Women (April 7 issue of The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))

New study says female brain is wired for emotion - Turhan Canli Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Women's Mental Skills Vary During Monthly Cycle - Behavioral Neuroscience 2000;114:1245-1250

Bad Driving 'Linked To Hormones' (BBC News 1-26-5) "Men do seem to be better at spatial abilities, and women at verbal and emotional skills.- Dr Neave, a member of the British Psychological Society

As Kipling says in his famous poem, the female of the species is more deadly than the male, but why? The answer, I believe, is that men, who are genetically and culturally programmed to be aggressors and fighters, have had to learn to control their aggressions in the interest of social harmony -- a control which is reflected in the compliment given to a man when that control has been displayed by calling him a 'gentleman'. Women, on the other hand, have not been taught to control their emotions, because they are usually under the direct control of men, rendering self-control unnecessary. However, on those occasions when the women are given free reign, as Indian women were given when allowed to torture prisoners, their uninhibited cruelty was brought to the surface for all to see. This, indeed, is why feminists are a dangerous and ugly breed, since they do not have men to keep their aggressions in check.

Thomas Jefferson was correct when he wrote:

>“Were our State a pure democracy . . . there would yet be excluded from their deliberations . . . women, who, to prevent depravation of morals and ambiguity of issue, should not mix promiscuously in the public meetings of men." -- Thomas Jefferson (Sept. 5, 1816).

A couple more articles of many. https://www.denverpost.com/2005/05/13/female-gis-report-rapes-in-iraq-war/ http://sputniknews.com/military/20150609/1023106666.html

[–] 0 pt

Preaching to the choir, brother.

Women are demonic children and only worth anything when their nature is kept on a leash by more dominant forces.

[–] 0 pt

>"Preaching to the choir, brother."

May be to you, but then again....

>"Women are demonic children and only worth anything when their nature is kept on a leash by more dominant forces."

I don't agree with your rather pretentious statement. Contrarily, my post was conveying -- In Nature male and female have very different roles to play. Our survival is dependent on reproduction and defense. Women in active military is not one of them.

[–] 0 pt

The entire Syria war can be reduced to two acting factors: Turkey's incessant land grabbing and Israel's continuous expansionism. Everyone else are pawns in this game. It's as if Israel cut a deal with Turkey saying: You can have all the land north of the Euphrates River. We want Damascus and the land south of the Euphrates. The Kurds, NATO, and the USA are pawns.

A small problem with your "logic". Syria was negotiating with Israel over the Golan Heights, but Obama stopped it and sent in jihadists via Turkey. Nowadays Russia accuses Turkey of supporting terrorists.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Sauce concerning the Obama "stopped it" part? Please send a link. It is now officially been revealed that Obama was secretly supporting jihad and killing American troops, but he didn't support Jihad for the reason you may be suggesting. First thing is Obama is a CIA creation. The CIA does not represent the interest of the American people and is a puppet of the Fractional Reserve Banking System taking orders from the City of London. This means he was always a Rothschild creation. Israel is also a Rothschild creation. 'Greater Israel' is the goal for Tel Aviv. It has been the goal since Israel's inception. Turkey is an accommodating force. They have been promised the spoils of war after Damascus falls. My premise is based on both fact and logic and is manifestly evident in describing the Syria conflict, especially telling is the current demarcation line.

Regarding the negotiation you mentioned, my understanding was Damascus was negotiating the return of the Golan Heights to Syria. Typically when negotiating, certain 'bargaining chips' are brought to the table in hope of signing the deal. What did Syria offer in return? What did Israel demand from Syria? Negotiations are always part of the chess game. Many times the demands are far too high and not tenable. Many times the negotiation itself is a bluff and act as a delay tactic while 'certain' behind-the-scene moves are being made.

You made many assumptions and then came up with rational in support. If you want to see what is going on, let go of assumptions look at the facts alone.

  1. There is a worldwide central banking cartel that issues money. Only N. Korea, Cuba, and Iran issue their own money.
  2. There are only 3 reserve currencies, with all other currencies based on these, i.e., they are rebranded dollars, pounds, and euros.
  3. There is only one government owned central bank that issues a reserve currency - the Bank of England in the City of London.

Brittan appointed itself as the official historian. This is why everything you know is false. You literally know nothing about US, Israel, Russia, etc... and your assumptions prevent you from seeing the light.

She talks slot for someone who is supposed to be already in gitmo. I'm pretty disappointed by her still being free and never seeing that pedovore perp walk.