What's note worthy is they in fact did Trump's successor con men a solid. They could have taken up the issue even though he had left office under the public interest exception to mootness where an issue is "capable of repetition but evading review". https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12334123945835207673&q=capable+of+repetition+but+evading+review&hl=en&as_sdt=2003
What's note worthy is they in fact did Trump's successor con men a solid. They could have taken up the issue even though he had left office under the public interest exception to mootness where an issue is "capable of repetition but evading review". https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12334123945835207673&q=capable+of+repetition+but+evading+review&hl=en&as_sdt=2003
(post is archived)