Imagine if they could be arsed to hear evidence of election fraud.
Imagine if they could be arsed to hear evidence of election fraud.
A suit brought by the ((( Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington ))):
- Noah Bookbinder, Executive Director ()
A suit brought by the ((( Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington ))):
* Noah Bookbinder, Executive Director ([jewish](https://www.facebook.com/TheRAC/posts/temple-emanuels-noah-bookbinder-quoted-in-todays-new-york-timeswere-glad-that-th/10154067268277115/))
not archiving a kikebook link.
>not archiving a kikebook link.
[here](https://archive.md/JU5e5)
Supreme court is performing token judgments so the public actually thinks the gubmint still works.
Well, consider this: Impeaching Trump and setting the date of impeachment to his first day of orifice thus invalidating his presidency.
smoke and fucking mirrors.
Supreme court is performing token judgments so the public actually thinks the gubmint still works.
Well, consider this: Impeaching Trump and setting the date of impeachment to his first day of orifice thus invalidating his presidency.
smoke and fucking mirrors.
What's note worthy is they in fact did Trump's successor con men a solid. They could have taken up the issue even though he had left office under the public interest exception to mootness where an issue is "capable of repetition but evading review". https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12334123945835207673&q=capable+of+repetition+but+evading+review&hl=en&as_sdt=2003
What's note worthy is they in fact did Trump's successor con men a solid. They could have taken up the issue even though he had left office under the public interest exception to mootness where an issue is "capable of repetition but evading review". https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12334123945835207673&q=capable+of+repetition+but+evading+review&hl=en&as_sdt=2003
(post is archived)