I find it interesting that people will find some aspect of a persons position that they don't agree with, then use that to infer all of that person's positions are invalid. Good luck finding people who only agree with you 100%. How do you make sense of anything if you can't weigh other peoples individual separate arguments on their own merits? Alot of what Jordan Peterson says makes sense, some of it seems to me like bad conclusions, but he clearly is doing more good than harm.