I never understood why poor people think democrats are on their side. Every major democrat run city is a disaster.
There has to be a term for people who consistently believe lies over and over even after the liar has proven themselves to be in it for themselves.
It's not just poor people either. I've seen plenty of middle and upper-middle people, who have a tertiary education and triple-digit IQs who live in these cities and continue to vote Democrat and think the solution to everything is to continue moving further left. Most seem to think emotionally though and they'd have a nervous breakdown if they came to realization that leftist policies are deleterious and destructive all around. They flee or want to flee places like California and New York, but for some reason can't comprehend that Democrat/leftist policies ruined those places in the first place.
We need to develop a drug that lessens empathy. As White men become more feminine, their empathy for others, really everything, increases to a dangerous level, shunting their ability to make necessary logical decisions.
It's not empathy. True empathy is to realize what's best for your own people as well as everyone else's. What leftists have is narcissistic egomania with a veneer of empathy. All of their gestures are shallow and empty. They will advocate for something solely because it's trendy with zero regard for the outcome or impact. It's the exact opposite of empathy
There has to be a term for people who consistently believe lies over and over even after the liar has proven themselves to be in it for themselves.
It makes sense if you lack the information necessary to accurately critique it. Cutting taxes on big businesses looks like corruption if you are not financially literate. But then if you think it through, like "oh wait, inflation is technically a tax on corporations and they just raise prices, that's why a bag of cheetos that used to cost $1 now costs $1.78 and has less weight. Meaning corporate taxes is really just a poor tax" then it makes sense.
Democracy is the scam that even a majority of participants can properly educate themselves when it is, and always has been, a small minority who care. It's just a method for the rich to fool the masses into voting against their interests.
And by the way it's not a bad thing that people are this way. You don't want everyone to become financial professionals or waste their time studying politics and history. That would be a disaster. You WANT people who obsessively specialize in, idk, chiseling goofy shit into walls or engraving stuff. You just don't want them voting on finance or whatever.
Cutting taxes on big businesses looks like corruption if you are not financially literate.
It also looks like corruption when you are financially literate.
Super-jew Milton Friedman advanced the concept of corporate taxation being bad, with his whole "The corporation can no more pay tax than the floor can", but he neglected to mention that his proposals of exempting corporations from taxation came at the cost of making individual taxpayers pay even more.
For some reason, simply abolishing income tax altogether, or at least abolishing it on individuals, never seems to be an option.
But, as Friedman himself (conversableeconomist.blogspot.com)lamented, he had a rich history of coming up with good ideas that had economy-wrecking, and even nation-destroying, consequences because he did not think them through before advocating and implementing them.
He's right, corporations can't pay taxes. It comes from share holders, customers or employees. Where else could it possibly come from?
This method of taxation has been used to hide taxes away where nobody can see them. When you buy a soda you are paying the taxes on the tin, the gasoline, the sugar, whatever else. That is an invisible tax because it doesn't show up on the receipt and it's processed on the back end.
A direct tax is preferable if for no other reason that it makes people choke on their spit and take to the streets.
That being said, it isn't as simple as "oh so no corporate tax is Jewish and having corporate tax isn't". Having no corporate tax can be favorable for one business for aggressive expansion, and after this expansion high taxes would be favorable to squash competitors and have them dancing on razor thin margins.
$15 minimum wage would've been bad for Amazon early on, but now they are lobbying for $15 minimum wage to crush their competitors. Not the best example since minimum wage is cancerous no matter what, I'm just saying things can be good and bad depending on what cycle certain groups are in and what their goals are.
Every major democrat run city is a disaster.
Nowadays, but when major US cities were last great, they were also run by dems. The democrat party changed its stance but not its name, as opposed to the GOP who have been big-business globalists since the 1854.
It also helps that these "good democrats" of yore were straight and generally White, whereas now they're women/faggots/kikes/niggers.
>There has to be a term for people who consistently believe lies over and over even after the liar has proven themselves to be in it for themselves.
Cattle.
Because muh racism.
(post is archived)