WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

460

Lets look at the factors that indicate a war:

Iran and china were never on each others side.

China and Israel collaborate, even if they're on other sides of the fence.

Israel through the GOP and DNC and their CIA Media arms just helped china lease control over the u.s, so Xi owes Israel a favor. What better way to pay it back then send the manchurian u.s. government to war in iran?

Iran knows this and the best indicator of it is that they just announced the formation of a major regional equivalent to NATO, with Iran attempting to take the next major step toward power in the middle east, creating a defense bloc.

The U.S.-Chinese war is off the table in the immediate future (for obvious reasons), but the u.s. is significantly politically unstable and economically struggling and heading toward much worse on both fronts. Literally nothing will fix it except a real outbreak thats massive and genuinely dangerous, a huge crackdown on the public, and/or an external war. The U.S. will choose an external war, seeing as the USD is shitting the bed or about to, and the pentagon backers on warstreet need a final confetti-splurge before saying amen and giving up the ghost, helping to juice the numbers on say, the DOW.

In general this is a "strike while the iron is hot" moment in geopolitics, and every indicator, based on current actions and statements, says that is the thinking and mood of the establishment in DC.

Also China needs the u.s. in shambles, or badly embarrassed, and an intentionally mismanaged war would be just the thing to do that.

Theres also the question of the neoliberal/globalist anti-russian agenda. And they can't complete the encirclement of russia without fully securing the middle east first.

It'll require a major initiating event to get the public on board with an iranian war. Maybe another 9/11 equivalent false flag. Assume the actual planning took 1-2 years. They've run the playbook before, so lets go with one year--also the u.s. government isn't seeking the approval of the american people any more for anything, they're done with the charade. Power has taken off its mask.

Assume half the planning is already done.

troop and asset preplacement - 6 months

tit-for-tat geopolitical breakdown and pressure campaigns - 6 month

geopolitical obstacles clear, logistics - 2 years

Any time between now and the next 3 1/2 years, or 1,278 days, till a probable war with iran

But now lets consider the rapid pace of geopolitical events, both home and abroad. Something has certainly changed. Looking at the accelerated time table that the state is now moving at, a factor of 8-10 in fact, we are likely looking at a war with iran any time between the next 128 to 160 days, or at least a false flag to facilitate a war shortly after that period.

That corresponds to anywhere from Monday, May 31, 2021 to Friday, July 2, 2021

Lets look at the factors that indicate a war: Iran and china were never on each others side. China and Israel collaborate, even if they're on other sides of the fence. Israel through the GOP and DNC and their CIA Media arms just helped china lease control over the u.s, so Xi owes Israel a favor. What better way to pay it back then send the manchurian u.s. government to war in iran? Iran knows this and the best indicator of it is that they just announced the formation of a major regional equivalent to NATO, with Iran attempting to take the next major step toward power in the middle east, creating a defense bloc. The U.S.-Chinese war is off the table in the immediate future (for obvious reasons), but the u.s. is significantly politically unstable and economically struggling and heading toward much worse on both fronts. Literally nothing will fix it except a *real* outbreak thats massive and genuinely dangerous, a *huge* crackdown on the public, and/or an external war. The U.S. will choose an external war, seeing as the USD is shitting the bed or about to, and the pentagon backers on warstreet need a final confetti-splurge before saying amen and giving up the ghost, helping to juice the numbers on say, the DOW. In general this is a "strike while the iron is hot" moment in geopolitics, and every indicator, based on current actions and statements, says that is the thinking and mood of the establishment in DC. Also China needs the u.s. in shambles, or badly embarrassed, and an intentionally mismanaged war would be just the thing to do that. Theres also the question of the neoliberal/globalist anti-russian agenda. And they can't complete the encirclement of russia without fully securing the middle east first. It'll require a major initiating event to get the public on board with an iranian war. Maybe another 9/11 equivalent false flag. Assume the actual planning took 1-2 years. They've run the playbook before, so lets go with one year--also the u.s. government isn't seeking the approval of the american people any more for anything, they're done with the charade. Power has taken off its mask. Assume half the planning is already done. troop and asset preplacement - 6 months tit-for-tat geopolitical breakdown and pressure campaigns - 6 month geopolitical obstacles clear, logistics - 2 years Any time between now and the next 3 1/2 years, or 1,278 days, till a probable war with iran But now lets consider the rapid pace of geopolitical events, both home and abroad. Something has certainly changed. Looking at the accelerated time table that the state is now moving at, a factor of 8-10 in fact, we are likely looking at a war with iran any time between the next 128 to 160 days, or at least a false flag to facilitate a war shortly after that period. That corresponds to anywhere from Monday, May 31, 2021 to Friday, July 2, 2021

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

I suspect they are planning to finish off Syria this year.

Can't get away with venezuela as you said, and syria opens possibilities to iran. So this year or next at most. Except we've already started a major move on syria. See what I mean by accelerated time table?

A move on iran would look like and likely start with a move on syria.

Anything more direct would be too closely tied to the u.s. elections and Iran could rightly accuse us of having cynically waited until after and preplanning the whole thing.

If we can't move on Iran directly, and a color revolution would fail in syria (Iran, Turkey, and Russia would put it down), and the pentagon wants an excuse to be there anyway, then the next step would be regime change and 'peace keeping' in syria. And that acts as the launching pad to attack or destabilize iran.

[–] 1 pt

The only way I can see this happening is if we nuke Tehran when we knew the leadership was there and the US wrote it off as a "Iran built a nuclear bomb and fucked up". But the US would have to blitzkrieg their way in since the Russians would try to grab the northern part of the country. No mullah mother fuckers mean the Iranian military would either not fight or fight. There is also a chance the military could make a run for it into Russia, fearing annulation.

[–] 1 pt

I think the U.S. would go for sabotage, color revolution, and 'counter insurgence' through proxies first--aided and supplied from bases out of syria.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Yeah, that's the usual way. The playbook has always been to instigate a war. Not fire first. Why else would the U.S military go to so much trouble training all these rebels in the middle east if they could just lob a few nukes at their enemies.