Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

103

You all owe it to yourself to read it, even if you disagree with his overarching ideology (something like anarcho-primitivism), or his methods (bombing people).

Here's a small excerpt:

The leftist’s feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame for an individual’s ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is “inferior” it is not his fault, but society’s, because he has not been brought up properly.

Read the entire thing here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm

Remember this was written by a 168 IQ prodigy who went to Harvard at 16. They want you to believe the only people who think this stuff are inbred rednecks. Couldn't be further from the truth.

You all owe it to yourself to read it, even if you disagree with his overarching ideology (something like anarcho-primitivism), or his methods (bombing people). Here's a small excerpt: > The leftist’s feelings of inferiority run so deep that he cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. This also underlies the rejection by many leftists of the concept of mental illness and of the utility of IQ tests. Leftists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behavior because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. Leftists prefer to give society the credit or blame for an individual’s ability or lack of it. Thus if a person is “inferior” it is not his fault, but society’s, because he has not been brought up properly. Read the entire thing here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm Remember this was written by a 168 IQ prodigy who went to Harvard at 16. They want you to believe the only people who think this stuff are inbred rednecks. Couldn't be further from the truth.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (58).
[–] • 9 pts

So basically leftism is about having a childish, effeminate mindset; not taking responsibility but delegating it to others. If simplified that way, modern democracy appears as nothing but a tool of destruction - you divide society to the people who do and don't have responsibility and give each an equal vote. Democracy is like an axe to split a people's unity.

[–] • 9 pts

That is basically my conclusion as well.

Look at the internet. Before Facebook/Twitter, everything was fine and fun. People argued a bit but everyone always went their ways and nothing of issue happened. Then, Facebook and Twitter brought women on to the internet and all shit broke loose. The leftist politics have many layers, but it parasatizes women and feminized men as a substrate upon which it reproducs.

I used to think ideas like liberalism and free speech were universal ideals. Now I just see them as a subset of a large cognitive toolset used to help genetic groups survive. Right wing / masculine perspectives build and propagate the genetic lines. Liberal / feminine perspectives consume, destroy and extinguish genetic lines.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts (edited )

You missed the LiveJournal phase. I used to be a fangirl of various shows and the venomous SJW Woke crap that is destroying us had its genesis there.

I remember making a post once and said someone was fat (because they were) and I was attacked by all sides. Fangirls were also pestering showrunners to put "representation" into their shows.

I turned against it all. Deleted everything, started off with Breitbart, then found Voat.

[–] • 4 pts

Heh, I forgot about the transition phase.

For me, the end of the road is the realization that the male and female psychology have co-evolved in unique ways that somehow are supposed to fit together to build something greater. They aren't polar opposites or the ying and yang of each other. Instead, they seem like complicated and totally different puzzle pieces that at first glance you cannot imagine would ever fit together, but when you figure it out and put the pieces together where each piece respects its relative position in the puzzle something greater than the sum of the parts happens.

There are only two genders .... for a reason.

Isn't it interesting that when you read Breitbart, Voat, etc ... there is a clarity and purpose to everything that is said? Go to Reddit or Facebook and it is nothing but hedonistic chaos. On Breitbart and Voat, you can make sense of the world, morality and your place in it. On Reddit and Facebook, nothing makes sense, you cannot tell right from wrong and everyone is always in a state of perpetual drama.

When I found the right wing, I found peace.

[–] • 2 pts

also Pinterest. Sounds crazy to include it but that site put so much pressure on moms and women in general, with everyone competing to see who could send their kids to school with the most creative lunch. and like everything else, it was all by design.

[–] • 6 pts

It's why I always say that leftists have the mental age, behaviour and mindset of a toddler.

[–] • 4 pts

Anyone can see democracy is a tool of destruction. I mean, everyone gets a vote lmao

[–] • 1 pt

The point is division. I did not take a specific viewpoint from the left-right political spectrum

[–] • 4 pts

Leftism is emotional, if the leftist's feelings are hurt the other person must be wrong and has to stop talking, and if they don't the name-calling starts

There will never be unity because the left's definition of unity is that everyone gives in to the left. Your money is invited to their party but you aren't welcome.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

Yeah. When you look at the foundations of democratic republics like the USA, they clearly never intended to give the vote to all people. Hell even to this day we don't give it to all people (children and non-citizens), although I'm sure the left would try to change that if they could.

Democracy is a good idea among people who are more or less equals. If we're on the same level financially and culturally, we'll probably vote for things that benefit everyone. If you're a weakling, loser, foreigner, etc, you're probably going to vote to take shit away from people who aren't.

[–] • 1 pt

Democracy is like two wolves and a sheep deciding what's for dinner.