Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.4K

Just got done reading a demoralization thread. And here is the response.

However, as we have increasingly seen most people don't care about liberty and won't stand against tyranny.

I disagree. The most blatant lie of our age is that we have no power or voice.

People can and will listen to the truth if you present it to them. They may not accept it. They may reject it. They may even attack you for it. But they will listen.

And if enough people spend the time to tell others face to face what is actually going on, with conviction but without malice, people will start asking "how can I help? what can we do?"

And you need to be prepared to answer those questions.

Just got done reading a demoralization thread. And here is the response. > However, as we have increasingly seen most people don't care about liberty and won't stand against tyranny. I disagree. The most blatant lie of our age is that we have no power or voice. People can and will listen to the truth if you present it to them. They may not accept it. They may reject it. They may even attack you for it. But they will listen. And if enough people spend the time to tell others **face to face** what is actually going on, with conviction but without malice, people will start asking "how can I help? what can we do?" And you need to be prepared to answer those questions.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (12).
[–] • 0 pt

was literally about what can be done. Our manifesto and movement also has many other ideas, recommendations and strategies. I run (a sub for black market organization) and also .

We also had in our sub about strategies randomly posted at the same time.

Taking realistic stock of the situation is not the same as demoralization.

[–] • 1 pt

when a single tip off could lead to everyone being gulagged.

Thats not realistic stock of a situation.

Mass arrests would immediately lead to mass responses, and I think this is a sober assessment of how people would react.

Maybe I'm mistaken.

Because of that there is a real risk the the American public will roll over without a fight and give up their weapons willingly.

Yes there is a real risk the american public would roll over, but not as much of a risk as you think.

Just reading the public mood, it seems like americans have learned their lesson of go-along-to-get-along. And the claim that they would revert to 'go along to get along' is what I was objecting to.

Call it my nickles worth.

We really need some sort of organization to gather rumors/gossip at the local level and aggregate it to get a better understanding of where we are at nationally.

[–] • 0 pt

We really need some sort of organization to gather rumors/gossip at the local level and aggregate it to get a better understanding of where we are at nationally.

Even if everyone understood the same things it is possible no one will want to act first.

(Also it's a bit funny because what you want is called essentially "an election")

[–] • 0 pt

Even if everyone understood the same things it is possible no one will want to act first.

It is not the nature of acting first, but the nature of the acts. Everyone wants hollywood. No one understands death by ten thousand papercuts.

(Also it's a bit funny because what you want is called essentially "an election")

Election or not, the biggest thing we are suffering from is the fog of war.

You cannot choose the correct direction to reach a desired destination without first knowing what direction your destination is to begin with.

Action is useless without workable and true news/information.

Otherwise you're just stumbling in the fog and dark, wandering in any old direction.

If it seems like I talk like a fortune cookie, forgive me. Political suppression tends to do that.