Assange never agreed to a non disclosure. You think it should be against the law for journalists to ask questions about war crimes? Crimes that actually happened?
Shill isn’t the word that came to mind.
Assange never agreed to a non disclosure. You think it should be against the law for journalists to ask questions about war crimes? Crimes that actually happened?
Shill isn’t the word that came to mind.
Generally yes. If the crime is bad enough it's up to whistle blowers to willingly give it up. How would a journalist even know about the war crime to start with? You shouldn't have foreign journalists hounding people with clearance for Intel as a general rule.
Generally yes. If the crime is bad enough it's up to whistle blowers to willingly give it up. How would a journalist even know about the war crime to start with? You shouldn't have foreign journalists hounding people with clearance for Intel as a general rule.
Traitor to a free republic is what comes to mind. The press should be actively doing their job and the people have a right to know what they are paying for.
Traitor to a free republic is what comes to mind. The press should be actively doing their job and the people have a right to know what they are paying for.
(post is archived)