Which means
trying to change the system by adding a new partyvoting is pointless.
FTFY
>Which means ~~trying to change the system by adding a new party~~ **voting** is pointless.
FTFY
That too, but since the topic of the post was related to parties, I figured that was the best response.
That too, but since the topic of the post was related to parties, I figured that was the best response.
Yes, I'm simply pointing out the topic is, well, pointless.
Yes, I'm simply pointing out the topic is, well, pointless.
Completely true.
Parties don't matter, and there have been a few posts about this today as well.
I commented before that parties are for weak and unintelligent people, and I want candidates to speak for themselves.
Not that it matters because voting doesn't make any difference anymore.
I am curious how this next congress is going to tackle the voting issue - but since dims own everything, I'm sure they won't see any problems with keeping things as they are.
Completely true.
Parties don't matter, and there have been a few posts about this today as well.
I commented before that parties are for weak and unintelligent people, and I want candidates to speak for themselves.
Not that it matters because voting doesn't make any difference anymore.
I am curious how this next congress is going to tackle the voting issue - but since dims own everything, I'm sure they won't see any problems with keeping things as they are.
(post is archived)