https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/01/jon-rappoport/the-criminal-who-blows-its-own-cover-fake-pcr-test/ NOW, the WHO is walking back their stance on how the PCR should be run, for the reasons I mentioned above. The WHO document is titled, “WHO Information Notice for IVD Users/Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2.” [2] >Here are the money quotes. The language is mealy-mouthed, intentionally confusing, cautious, and sterile. Nevertheless, we can see the intent to lower the number of test cycles. >“Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU [Information for Use] carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.” It was hinted at weeks ago by the WHO. And we can gather that this is the obvious plan to make the vaccine seem like it is working. You're right, the OP was shitty but I only posted it to expose the ultimate goal of the PCR/vaccine/political connection