WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

biden #worldhealthorganization #covid19 #sarscov2 #coronavirus

biden #worldhealthorganization #covid19 #sarscov2 #coronavirus

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

WARNING: This is a fake post by a disinfo source - a piece of shit traitor.

The cited source says NOTHING about reducing cycles. It is a request to collect and report information about test quality.

https://www.who.int/news/item/19-01-2021-who-information-notice-for-ivd-users-2021-01

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/01/jon-rappoport/the-criminal-who-blows-its-own-cover-fake-pcr-test/

NOW, the WHO is walking back their stance on how the PCR should be run, for the reasons I mentioned above.

The WHO document is titled, “WHO Information Notice for IVD Users/Nucleic acid testing (NAT) technologies that use real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of SARS-CoV-2.” [2]

Here are the money quotes. The language is mealy-mouthed, intentionally confusing, cautious, and sterile. Nevertheless, we can see the intent to lower the number of test cycles.

“Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU [Information for Use] carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.”

It was hinted at weeks ago by the WHO. And we can gather that this is the obvious plan to make the vaccine seem like it is working.

You're right, the OP was shitty but I only posted it to expose the ultimate goal of the PCR/vaccine/political connection

[–] 0 pt

It basically says follow the instructions. Unless they were previously told to not follow the instructions, and run more cycles to get more positives. But if that were the case, we'd be able to find evidence of that request. Since there is no evidence, I'm gonna have to say no.