After the really, really lock the crimes in....Don't want to spring the trap too early.
This.
I had a ton of posts on Voat saved to throw in the faces of every "legal expert" on there that spouted nonsense about "gotta keep the evidence secret" and similar bullshit.
If evidence can't survive exposure, it isn't evidence at all.
They have plenty of evidence. What they lack is proof. I'd say a lot of the evidence they have is still very solid in alleging voter fraud, but it's all circumstantial evidence.
The issue wasn't that they had the evidence or not.
The issue on voat was that they could never "show" the evidence due to some random, and often extremely weak, argument - such as "it would give the libtards a chance to think of excuses" etc.
Evidence that can't survive exposure is not evidence.
(post is archived)