Oh sure. Now he's talking big.
Isn't it absolutely amazing how we have seen everyones true colours through all of this?
We now know the faces of ALL of our enemies.
Rand is a disgrace to the Paul family name.
Rand has been amazingly consistent from what I've seen.
What specifically do you take issue with?
So much for a man of principle watching the election being rigged and stolen in the open and NOT voting to overturn.
If he had principle he would have done what is just and what is right and voted with the few principled GOP members to overturn the election results. The ones that voted to overturn an illegitimate and clearly stolen election not only were brave BUT were absolutely bound by consitutional duty to do so as it is a well established principled. This fucking chicken little claims the consitution does not allow him to overturn the vote of the state electors. Absolute bullshit, just watch Robert Barnes comments on the topic.
Then he went on to tar and feather all of the people in DC with slander because a few people got a little rowdy and entered the capitol WHILE WALKING WITHIN VELVET ROPES.
He claims he is principled, but he is not. He is weak and shallow.
Remember this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25P4GNi0oWM
Watch his body language. I was wondering why he looked so weak, frail and spineless there. I have been attacked in crowds and it's scary sure, but there is a posture and a stance a man takes that tells the crowd you are ready to fight and ready to die if necessary. Rands body language is the language of a coward, a feminized man afraid of everything around him and afraid of his own mortality.
Rand is a weak man that wears the coat of "principle" to shield his weak body. He saw the fixing and stealing of the election just like he saw those BLM protesters and he fucking collapsed like a wet noodle.
Rand is not a man of principle because he is barely a man.
They always talk big when they lack power. Then we vote them in based on those big words and they do jackshit.
When we call them cucks, it's actually literal.
GOP are the OFFICIAL OPPOSITION. They literally chose that role. That's Mitch McConnel 101. He LOVES to be in power of the inferior position. This is literally cuckholdery. They LOVE to be the second man. GOPers don't want to actually DO anything, it's far easier to just bitch about everyone else, and not actually do anything, nor preserve anything. These fucking cucks are worse than the commies.
And who are we here complaining about people complaining and not doing anything?
To be fair, he got picked on rather often by a lot of the Trump people because he stood up to trump several times, told him he wasn’t doing enough. The guy pisses off everybody. His message seems to be pretty consistent, he does what he says he’s going to do, and while I don’t particularly care for any politician I don’t understand why he gets a bad rap. I don’t really remember him saying something and then doing something different. I’m open to being educated here, maybe he’s a douche and I just didn’t realize it.
Is this because he didn’t defend the horrible arguments made by trumps legal team? They did a terrible, flat out terrible job of laying out a case for election fraud. Terrible. They did a horrible horrible job. That’s not Rand’s fault.
OK, I’m seeing some of the other responses now. Yeah that makes sense. I don’t know he never struck me that way so I’ll take your word for it. You guys know more about him than I do apparently.
He also stood by Trump many times when he was right and nobody else would. The man is consistent with principles. If he is only 70% consistent with your zio-con fav politician then I guess you can hate him for that.
Rand is the only person in Congress right now with an R next to his name who would cut funding for Israel. The man is the only one in congress with principles. So when Trump and Rand disagree on something it's probably Trump that's wrong.
He has consistently stayed on the right side. He's talked big in many ways when others wouldn't. He denounced the Twitter ban when very few politicians would speak publicly about it. He spoke against the impeachments.
His supposed silence before hand is just your not keeping up with stories. He's supposed to be punished because you weren't reading?
He decided to turn his back on democracy because of what happened on Jan 6. Not liking what happened that day is fine, but the response to that wasn't to verify a fraudulent election. Throwing democracy away is unforgiveable and dwarfs all the good things he's done.
(post is archived)