WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 6 pts

If the filthy jews do indeed get complete control over the net then that will be the day that they will be miserable because folks will take it to the streets 100% of the time.

[–] 1 pt

Tor browsers and dark web forums are going to get a lot more popular too

[–] 1 pt

Many tor nodes are owned by intelligence agencies so they can monitor as much about the traffic and IP's as they can, just fyi.

[–] 1 pt

Can't say I'm surprised. There is really nowhere to hide, it seems

[–] 1 pt

No need to crop out the goy of the leadership team. Still 80% jews in control of the org is a tad skewed from the what, 2% of general population.

[–] 1 pt

Digital Bill of Rights. Badly needed. A digital legal system that handles tyrants.

[–] 1 pt

Here is how I imagine their playbook working

(we are here) Phase 1: Associate any Application that is NOT the main controlled one as Harboring "HATE GROUPS". Even though everyone knows Facebook, Gmail and Twitter were all used by the same groups, ignore that, and have the non-main applications banned.

Phase 2: Websites. Ask nicely of all browsers to BLOCK access to certain websites, (e.g. poal)... (Fire Fuck is already looking into this btw).

Phase 3: Require all ISP's to ban "HATE" platforms... which are not on a certain list. Laws will be in place that would hold the citizen accountable for attempting to access these. They would most likely tie them into current CP laws as one bundle. Moving anyone who tries to access them into requiring VPN services.

Phase 4: Like China, you are now only allowed to access a select list of pre-approved applications and services that are heavily monitored by the US Government and at some point.

Phase 5: These websites slowly roll out a "verification requirement" that requires you to upload your real identification with your account. Thus tying everything to you, in one neat little package.

(This is where we will end up before the end of the Biden admin).

With this in place, "all the cows are in one cage". They can create profiles on you very easily, like the government. "Internal leaks" would "accidently" happen, which would expose (modified) conversations between people of the opposition (look at what reddit did to users), thus giving them a career death sentence.

At some point there will be ZERO thought against anything that is not pre-approved allowed to be written on any of the remaining platforms.

[–] 1 pt

Any idea on the cause of action they used to sue Apple? Or, how they have any standing at all to bring a lawsuit against apple?

[–] 1 pt

Death threats against their Jewish leader, apparently.

[–] 0 pt

Their leader? You mean Satan?

Section 230 that shit.

[–] 0 pt

Same (((people))) have been introducing hate speech laws in many countries. First its to protect minorities and eventually its changed to make criticism of them illegal.

[–] 0 pt

A tool used to disseminate market competition, so that only one pre-moderated messages can reverberated on all of digital media.

It's actions like these that will lead to (((their))) prophecised 6million.

[–] 0 pt

This will be dismissed by any non-jew for lack of standing. You can't sue people (or companies) on behalf of other people unless they hire you as their attorney to do so. I can't go sue Twitter for doing mean things to Trump. It has to be me that suffers the harm from their actions.

[–] 0 pt

It’s cute that you still think the courts work this way. Nationwide injunction against Telegram incoming.

[–] 0 pt

That's the great thing about appellate courts: they have to issue an opinion. If they issue an opinion that says you can sue online companies because they're doing (or not doing) something, it's gonna be open season on tech firms by places like Judicial Watch.