Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

676

It appears that an anon on /pol/ was just trying to unload some crappy laptops for big bucks, but then it turned into something else entirely. Claimed that laptops listed with serial number 'TPW P4-15-NB' had dirt on Hillary. The Q idea grew from there and then others claimed to be the true source. From then on it took on a life of its own.

See for original 4chan post from 2016 containing content matching the serial numbers.

Compare images in the links , , and .

It appears that an anon on /pol/ was just trying to unload some crappy laptops for big bucks, but then it turned into something else entirely. Claimed that laptops listed with serial number 'TPW P4-15-NB' had dirt on Hillary. The Q idea grew from there and then others claimed to be the true source. From then on it took on a life of its own. See [HERE](https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/p4-15-nb/page/4/) for original 4chan post from 2016 containing content matching the serial numbers. Compare images in the links [HERE](https://chanology.com/library/misc/Origin%20of%20Q%201.jpg), [HERE](https://chanology.com/library/misc/Origin%20of%20Q%202.jpg), and [HERE](https://chanology.com/library/misc/Origin%20of%20Q%203.jpg).

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (57).
[–] • 0 pt

Should we believe YOU? Did you predict NG in state capitals now over 2 years ago?

[–] • 0 pt

Really? That's an easy one to predict long term given the climate.

Q also said Hillary would be arrested in 2017; why don't we discuss that one?

[–] • 0 pt

Easier. Even Q says they put disinfo in their posts. Easy to see why such a threat might be used to to get the target make moves.

On the other hand, you really changed the question....How likely would it be to predict something, multiple times, as "disinfo" that is as specific and unanticipated as the current NG actions?

So here's another example you'll try to avoid by "not understanding the question": Q asked Qanons for a phrase or term for Trump to work into a public statement...and was asked by an anon to have Trump use the term "tippy-top". Which Trump did a day later.

Now change the subject because you don't have an answer.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

How new are you?

Seriously, the truth movement across the internet has literally speculated and discussed at length everything in the past decade or more. In case you're unaware, Q drops were basically information that /we/ had already been discussing at the time, but turned into cryptic nonsense by Q to entice you, and led credence to the message. Literally everyone on the left has been claiming that Trump is a dictator for four years, and that he would refuse to leave office, or that martial law would be declared. It's not difficult to make that connection...

Even Q says they put disinfo in their posts.

Then why believe any of it? Better yet, Q could just save face when his claims turn out to be bunk by saying 'see, that was just disinfo but it's necessary'. Why did Trump repeat the message? Because it lends credence to his base that he's actually doing something. Did saying "tippy-top" arrest Hillary?

Answer me this question: if Q is revealing the deepest of deep-state secrets, yet you are not required to do anything about it, why should you know?