But to this end anyone can lift images off the board then circle back around tying a decade's old /g/ copypasta that predates their claim (e.g. 2013) to craft any narrative they want. Am I supposed to be having fun tearing this apart?
Multiple images matching exact serial number and claim from back in 2016
No other matching image exists in a reverse lookup
Do you understand how probability works? As far as the internet goes, this is pretty much irrefutable. Your only argument at this point would be to claim that the serial number is shopped.
The images have the .xif stripped out so it is not as if we can determine the current year. They are high resolution but upscaling could account for that as well. The fact that they aren't on image search could also mean that they were taken by the original copypasta maker but none of that ties the images to the claim that Q was going to be used to sell laptops especially since his posts were "not named" and also miraculously unlinked in this text file. You can annotate any picture with any amount of bullshit you want and it still does not link the two together.
Claims:
Possession of laptops. Irrelevant but possibly proven. Poster of threads about laptops: Irrelevant but possibly proven. Origin of Q: Unproven. Possibly disproven considering there were 229 Q posts before November 25 2017 when the migration to 8ch happened in #230 with 0 instances of the word "laptop" which first appeared on Dec 4 2017 in #247.
You're not understanding.
This guy was not Q, but started it as an act before, and then 'Q' as you know him came to be from that idea.
(post is archived)