Right I'm going to take an undated text file with 3 photos as proof that someone created Q to sell off some milspec laptops that were all reported collected and destroyed but still have some boogieman proof encryption that can't be read, but certainly didn't have any DMS that triggers when not joined with a CLAS network in X cycles.
Give me 5 minutes in notepad and over 9000 hours in MS paint, and I'll have you believe that Bigfoot, the Easter Bunny, and Aquaman engage in transpecies/interracial gangbangs.
Yeah, that's the point. You have to compare all three sources (Chanology, 4plebs, and images) to understand.
The claim is that this guy started it to sell the laptops, but then it took on a meaning of its own, then someone ran off with the Q idea. Check the 4plebs dates and compare with the serial numbers.
But to this end anyone can lift images off the board then circle back around tying a decade's old /g/ copypasta that predates their claim (e.g. 2013) to craft any narrative they want. Am I supposed to be having fun tearing this apart?
Multiple images matching exact serial number and claim from back in 2016
No other matching image exists in a reverse lookup
Do you understand how probability works? As far as the internet goes, this is pretty much irrefutable. Your only argument at this point would be to claim that the serial number is shopped.
(post is archived)