Q-anon is easy to refute and anti-Q-anon shills do not exist. The fact that you could spend time considering it's possible legitimacy and not waste your life glued to a screen researching conspiracy theories does not mean that large amounts of people have gotten sucked into the rabbit whole in a phenomenon only describable as mass psychosis. Also, everything that Q-anon touches does not turn into Q-anon e.g. me saying Q-anon is not real does not mean that I am saying Epstein killed himself; I was there during early pizzagate and guess what - even comet pizzas disgusting instagram page is not enough in itself to prove anything if there is no succesfully concluded investigation. There is no succesfully concluded investigation because a very high level assasination (perhaps I am a shill who is saying Epstein did not use a body double... or perhaps people who talk of stuff like that are kooks) was carried out to with high success and guess what, nobody cares, they have their entertainment and fast food - and most important of all, qanon videos to comfort them. So while you may learn something around spaces where Q people go to leech off other peoples' iq points and originality, I do not understand how Q-anon can have 'good core concepts' because any individual story stolen by Q-anon theorists can be chewed and digested on it's own without the brown sauce added to it.