> Both believer and non-believer fell for the same trap of consenting by free will of choice to an offered contract of belief. This is why pro-life and pro-choice can reason for half a century about what's right and wrong, without comprehending that the contract of belief called "abortion", was offered by a 3rd party who always had blood sacrifice in mind, and who not just branded and financed both pro-life and pro-choice movements to use the resulting conflict to keep abortion running unopposed, they also apply talmudic reasoning to both sides of the conflict, in form of offered contradictions, to keep the reasoning in perpetuity. This is an excellent example of a controlled conflict in perpetuation. And there are of course many more. Maybe the most massive of all endless perpetuations is that of money? For a thousand plus years, what "is our" money has always been the argument. Greenbacks vs Bank Notes, Gold vs Paper, Tally Sticks vs Coins. And now we have a modern incarnation of that same conflict: Crypto vs Fiat. That the popular debate is never about "why" or "if" we should use money at all ie- debating on if we should allow a third party who does not need to be involved in our day to day transactions to be there nonetheless; empowered by us who authorize said third party to become envolved and that which entices those using it to want more and more (of again the said third party); resulting indirect control of the masses by the few in control of magical idolotry units. A modern barter system that gets people as excited about 'money' may never be possible - unless of course the masses awaken to how they have been played as golems for the purpose of enriching a few while destroying one another - all in the name of a money system which is controlled by ((( third parties ))). Barter may also only be viable if we operated based on needs instead of wants, as you often point out.