Actually, you made the claim. I explained what is common knowledge. Your ignorance doesn't make me your tutor.
Why do you suppose people who actually know what they're talking about commonly state you're wrong? That in of itself should be screaming at you.
"it's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled."
If you stop and think about it, your position is comical. You're literally claiming the people who would know, don't know. Lol. Insanity.
I told you where and what to look for. You want to remain a useful idiot, that's your choice.
You're expecting me prove a claim where no claim exists... this is how dumb you are. I don't give a fuck how many people tell me I'm wrong when nobody can prove it -- I am not beholden to consensus like you're (((expecting))) me to be.
Q named the jew. Only Jews don't seem to know it. Been endlessly answered here and on voat.
It is YOUR claim that Q named the jew, and it is YOUR claim to prove. Without which you have nothing, and it can be dismissed.
You claimed he didn't. Everyone who knows anything says you're an idiot. It's your job to substantiate your claim which directly opposes the primary people who would know. Especially since it's target well documented and settled long ago.
I pointed it out for you. Hell, go review the qrv forums. Naming the jew was common.
But you've already proved you don't care about facts.
Jews love you.
Everyone who knows anything says
More not proving. Consensus is not proof. It is not my job to substantiate a claim nor is it possible when my claim is that there is no substantiation... again, this is how dumb you are. It is YOUR job to prove a thing when you claim that it exists, not for me to prove that it does not. Your abortion of logic is your own, and if you are an ambassador of Q, then this is a very poor showing.
The forums don't matter -- what matters is what SPECIFICALLY came from Q, not words on Voat.
You have proven nothing. Claim dismissed.
(post is archived)