WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Libertarianism and ethno-states do not have to be mutually exclusive

[–] -1 pt

They 100% do.

One core tenant of lolbergism is equality. That right there is anti-ethno-state.

There's no point replying. You're wrong. You're a fucking cuck. There's no discussion here. Lolberg is LITERALLY anti-White.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Sorry, you’re wrong. Libertarianism is about freedom for people and there is no reason that non-whites have to be considered people. They weren’t in America for a couple hundred years or so. Even besides that, white communities absolutely have the ability to eject undesirables without the assistance of government; they did it constantly up until the 1960s/70s.

[–] 0 pt

Women are treated equal to men under lolberg.

There. Right there is enough. You are now in communism. It's over.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

If equality is a core value of libertarianism, we simply make a new ideology which is libertarianism with equality. We can say this offshoot of libertarianism sees the land as belonging to the people, and that the policies that regulate domestic activity need not apply to other countries or to the interactions across the borders of our country and others. We simply remove the policies that don't work optimally, and put into place those that do. We have the freedom to mix and match all varieties of different political policies as we wish, to create our own ideology based on policy and goals, not principles. Politics should be practical, not dogmatic.