Courts not hearing it does not make either side factual either. It just means nobody gets any definite answers.
I get it, you're blindly adherent to one side, yet hate others for doing the same for the opposite side. But the fact is there are many claims that need to be addressed, but they are not. Nobody is going to get any answers and you blindly adherent assholes can all cry you're right through your piles of double standards.
All while ignoring the fact that all we have is accusations, and the refusal to hear them. We have a garbage Grey area that fucks the perception of election integrity for half of the country and just keeps people pitted against each other.
Refusing to find the truth is not a victory unless you're a psychopath. If they're so confident, show us why the accusations are wrong.
You are reversing the burden of proof.
Psychopath.
B/C the chimp says so. . .
"We win because nobody would look into it, that makes us right."
You are the exact type of ignorant you claim to hate.
So out of th 75 cases, nobody looked into the claims of fraud? Put down the kool-Aid Chimpy
(post is archived)