WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

661

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

A call with the President of the United States is not like recording a regular citizen.

[–] 0 pt
[–] 0 pt

Is this what passes as funny, clever, and insightful among the wetbrain set?

[–] 0 pt

This clears raffersperger of any wrongdoing. Also, the 1 party rule exists in DC.

[–] 0 pt

Except for the fact that the call was related to litigation and was confidential. The issue isn't that he recorded the call, the issue is that they leaked the call.

[–] 0 pt

As rspix000 says, the presence of 3rd-parties to the conversation waives that

[–] 0 pt

The NSA records it all anyway....

[–] 0 pt

So they're actually making stealth recordings legal because the person doing the recording consents, obviously. If they wanted to stop it they would make it illegal unless all recorded parties consent.

[–] 0 pt

Also, the presence of third parties to a conversation waives any attorney client privilege.

[–] 0 pt

One-party consent isn't so bad. Just put in a single word as part of the conversation, and you're good