Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

885

Regarding the seating of lawmakers from Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

“After all, those representatives were elected through the very same systems—with the same ballot procedures, with the same signature validations, with the same broadly applied decisions of executive and judicial branch officials—as were the electors chosen for the President of the United States under the laws of those states, which have become the subject of national controversy.”

Regarding the seating of lawmakers from Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. “After all, those representatives were elected through the very same systems—with the same ballot procedures, with the same signature validations, with the same broadly applied decisions of executive and judicial branch officials—as were the electors chosen for the President of the United States under the laws of those states, which have become the subject of national controversy.”

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (13).
[–] • 0 pt

inexplicable

Except there is a difference between what you are told to think and what commonly happens. Undervotes are not a new phenomenon.

_________

Here is an example:

In Florida during the 2016 Presidential Election, 118,219 voters voted only for president.

______________

Here are some more numbers from past elections, on the federal level:

In 2016, 136,669,276 voted for president. 131,652,458 voted for a Congress member.
In 2012, 129,085,410 voted for president. 124,793,115 voted for a Congress member.
In 2008, 131,313,820 voted for president. 122,959,841 voted for a Congress member.
In 2004, 122,295,345 voted for president. 114,413,842 voted for a Congress member.

__________

Look at it for yourself. https://www.fec.gov/introduction-campaign-finance/election-and-voting-information/

[–] • 0 pt

All you're showing is that voter fraud has probably been a thing for a long time.

[–] • 0 pt

I can understand you don’t want to admit that you’re both wrong and ignorant.

[–] • 0 pt

Lol, though I think all elections should face very tight scrutiny.