WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

797

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Didn't Eichenwald also act as proprietor of a pederast website when he was doing research on paedophiles? Remember when Paul Krugman was complaining that Q put child porn on his laptop - they do share an employer. I wonder if Krugman allowed Eichenwald to use his laptop - for research purposes, of course!

[–] 2 pts

Yes....yes he did. And his IP address also logged in at least 6x to watch a particular video of a 14 year old boy masturbating.

[–] 2 pts

For research purposes, of course! That makes it OK.

Leftists never get called to account, do they. They will create a furore about a fake pee-pee tape featuring consenting adults, but an one of their own of seeking out and viewing child pornography multiple times makes no impression.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

I got banned on Twatter for triggering Krugman when he said something so fucking retarded that an Economics 101 student would know better than to say.

[–] 3 pts

Krugman is an archetypical midwit, a sneering Tarquinoid. His entire sense of self depends on seeing himself as cleverer than everybody else, but he is so insecure that any hint of lèse-majesté triggers a narcissistic rage. He knows at some level that he has no deep grasp on his chosen subject, economics, because like an art, it requires a depth of discernment which will forever escape him, like a musician whose fingers can travel quickly across the keys but who cannot play musically. His Nobel prize is a joke. He essentially reinvented the concept of the division of labor, and declared it a bad thing.