You can only cry wolf so much, he's done.
One job.
This is misleading, even when technically correct - of course the immune system cannot block the virus like a shield. Regardless how the immunity is acquired, illness or vaccination, the virus must enter the body before it gets recognized and destroyed by the immune system. But the virus cannot replicate enough to spread and will die soon. Fauchi tries to prepare people to keep wearing masks forever, even when immune. A German politician tries the same, he says vaccinated people should wear masks cause of "solidarity".
This shit needs to end. It's so fucking stupid.
Great, now everyone that gets a vax can become a 'super spreader.' This shapeshifter is past due for needing strung up.
edit: wait, Oct 27th 2020??? How about "warned" instead.
Fauci is afraid people are starting to see how full of shit he always has been.
Keep doubling down.
Vax isn't enough, stay locked down
New strain, stay locked down
No herd immunity till halloween 2021, stay locked down.
Has this fuckhead been right about a single thing yet?
Nope, he has been wrong/lying the whole time, and we let him, an unelected asswipe jew, get away with it.
Lmfao
Just lock this guy up and put us out of his misery. He is a traitor.
That's the thing people aren't understanding about this "vaccine." You still get sick, you just don't get sick as bad (hopefully.)
Basically the same thing as the flu vaccine.
More or less, except the flu vaccine doesn't do anything at all most years. At least this stuff is supposed to cut down on the misery.
Isn't that all vaccines? You still catch the disease, but your body knows how to defeat it quickly and early before you get symptoms.
From what I understand about this one, and I may be wrong: It doesn't even do that, it just reduces your reaction. You still get it, and it still makes you sick, just not as bad.
A normal vaccine, like say for measles, it gives your body the ability to fight it off before it makes you sick.
I appreciate you explaining what the difference is supposed to be, but that difference sounds made up to me. It doesn't really make sense. It's true that so far they have established efficacy by people reporting if they have symptoms, but symptoms are a result of your immune system trying to clear an infection, not the infection itself. If symptoms are limited the infection must also be less severe, because your immune system is having to do less to fight and clear it.
Wait. I thought that this was A Great Leap Forward in medical technology. For $10,000,000,000.00 we get injectable Dristan but with facial paralysis? I would like my money back.
Worse, the vaccine is basically an angiotensin 2 blocker. If the mRNA is producing a spike protein that binds to your ACE 2 receptors, then it stands to reason that it will block the reuptake of Angiotensin 2.
What does this mean? I stop reading when I see Latin.
The virus attaches and injects it's "virus" in your cell in this thing on the cell called an ACE-2 receptor. It does so because the virus has a spike protein that fits to the ACE-2 receptor, much like a key can open a lock, and if you have copies of that key all those keys can open that same lock. That same lock is used to regulate stuff going in and out of the cells. The vaccine creates that key, but if you put a key in a lock then you can't put other keys in that lock, so keys that would naturally go into that lock to do regular cell shit(angiotensin 2) can't. Because the vaccine keys are clogging up all the locks.
(post is archived)