Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

949

I swear to you, we aren't crazy conspiracy theorists, or Jew haters just trying to cause problems for Jews. We are literally a group of people that have discovered a Jewish conspiracy to enslave humanity.

Jews are religiously instructed to own non-Jews. This isn't conspiracy. It's fact. It is written in their holy books. Here is just a taste.

.Extracts from the Jewish text the Talmud

"Just the Jews are humans, the non-Jews are no humans, but cattle" Kerithuth 6b, page 78, Jebhammoth 61

"The non-Jews have been created to serve the Jews as slaves" Midrasch Talpioth 225

"Sexual intercourse with non-Jews is like sexual intercourse with animals" Kethuboth 3b

"The non-Jews have to be avoided even more than sick pigs" Orach Chaiim 57, 6a

"The birth rate of non-Jews has to be suppressed massively" Zohar 11,4b

"As you replace lost cows and donkeys, so you shall replace non-Jews" Lore Dea 377, 1

These are just a few of countless examples.

Now the thing is, they have literally monopolized central banking, media, news and Hollywood. They undeniably hold more institutional power than any other group in society. This is alarming, seeing that they're religiously instructed from birth to subvert and control non-Jews for their own gain. It's no longer a just a plan because we can clearly see their plan playing out in real-time. There are numerous if not infinite well-documented instances of rich and powerful high level Jews acting in alignment with the Jewish plan laid out in their holy books.

Who is willing to debate this with me?

It breaks my heart because we are literally the most misunderstood group in existence. We aren't bad people out to propagate pointless lies. We are a group of people that have uncovered a plot against humanity and are risking it all to inform you of it.

I swear to you, we aren't crazy conspiracy theorists, or Jew haters just trying to cause problems for Jews. We are literally a group of people that have discovered a Jewish conspiracy to enslave humanity. Jews are religiously instructed to own non-Jews. This isn't conspiracy. It's fact. It is written in their holy books. Here is just a taste. .Extracts from the Jewish text the Talmud "Just the Jews are humans, the non-Jews are no humans, but cattle" Kerithuth 6b, page 78, Jebhammoth 61 "The non-Jews have been created to serve the Jews as slaves" Midrasch Talpioth 225 "Sexual intercourse with non-Jews is like sexual intercourse with animals" Kethuboth 3b "The non-Jews have to be avoided even more than sick pigs" Orach Chaiim 57, 6a "The birth rate of non-Jews has to be suppressed massively" Zohar 11,4b "As you replace lost cows and donkeys, so you shall replace non-Jews" Lore Dea 377, 1 These are just a few of countless examples. Now the thing is, they have literally monopolized central banking, media, news and Hollywood. They undeniably hold more institutional power than any other group in society. This is alarming, seeing that they're religiously instructed from birth to subvert and control non-Jews for their own gain. It's no longer a just a plan because we can clearly see their plan playing out in real-time. There are numerous if not infinite well-documented instances of rich and powerful high level Jews acting in alignment with the Jewish plan laid out in their holy books. Who is willing to debate this with me? It breaks my heart because we are literally the most misunderstood group in existence. We aren't bad people out to propagate pointless lies. We are a group of people that have uncovered a plot against humanity and are risking it all to inform you of it.

(post is archived)

[–] • 9 pts

Loxism is a big deal these days, but no one wants to be cancelled, erased, etc... so many just continue to feed the machine that eats the beast.

They hate us. Have always hated us. And will continue to hate us until a catalytic event that either makes all these Abrahamic beliefs irrelevant or one of us are completely destroyed.

[–] • 5 pts

Hitler tried to warn the world 80 years ago

[–] • 10 pts (edited )

Jesus beat him by 1900 years.

Same exact warning, other then Jesus did it 100 times better.

Jews killed them both.

[–] • 5 pts

Thus proving my theory that Hitler was the Second Coming of Christ

[–] • 2 pts

"Love one another as I have loved you", that famous message from hitler

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Hitler took the jews out of political power, and sent them to camps.

Jesus said he came for good of the jews and not the gentiles, who he referred to as dogs who should recognize the jews as their masters in exchange for scraps, he also promoted the destruction of the most advanced gentile society at the time, a society that had been gracious enough to support and protect both him and his followers.

He never removed a single jew from a position of power, talked about upholding jewish law, and talked up the pharisee until they rejected him as the Jewish messiah (it is on then that the "synagogue of satan" and "den of vipers" came out, and even then he talked about not being jewish as if it were an insult, insulting them by calling them posers).

Hos followers were all jewish, this was a requirement, as stated before, he explicitly rejected any gentile that wanted to be his disciple, except in the capacity as a lower class that served the jews.

Not to mention the generally Jewish stuff he said, like equating success with evil and poverty with goodness, promoting celibacy and antinatalism, breaking up the family unit, jewush supremacy and loxism, and so on.

Hitler was not a Christian, he claimed to be publicly, but he was already preparing to phase out the religion even before the second war started.

A Christian beleives in God and heaven, they talk about religion as being true, not just as being politically useful, Hitler was only concerned with Christianity in the terms of the political implications of endorsing or rejecting it, it was clear that he was aware that just publicly rejecting the religion immediately would make him lose valuable supporters, and that he saw it as an obstacle for the belief system he was planning on making dominant over Germany, his beleifs, which had centered around the German ethnicity (volk).

So what he had planned on was phasing Christianity out gradually over time, and we already saw the beginning of this process, eventually Christians would have been the next to be on the pointy end of his long knives.

His way of thinking and his actions were not those of a true believer in Christian concepts, but a politically minded person who thought of religion in purely practical terms, no Christian leader would talk about how much better it would be if his country had a more martial religion like Islam. Which is what Hitler had actually said.

In short, Jesus was not "based", and Hitler was not a fan of Christianity.

[–] • 0 pt

Mr H saw that satan had subverted christianity, jesus didnt live to see it, xcept in our hearts, hope both feel peace

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Regarding calling gentiles dogs: To quote from Life Application Study Bible in reference to Matthew 15:24:

Jesus' words do not contradict the truth that God's message is for all people. After all, when Jesus said these words, He was in Gentile territory on a mission to Gentile people. He ministered to Gentiles on many other occasions also. Jesus was simply telling the woman that Jews were to have the first opportunity to accept Him as the Messiah because God wanted them to present the message of salvation to the rest of the world. Jesus was not rejecting the Gentile woman. He may have wanted to test her faith, or He may have wanted to use the situation as another opportunity to teach that faith is available to all people. Had she taken what He said as an insult, as it may sound to us today, her faith would have been damaged and her daughter would not have been healed. It is obvious that she understood His reference as nothing more than a metaphor. Much the same as we are referred to as sheep.

[–] • 1 pt

Jesus was a Jew.

Portland is the whitest major city in America (with a very low jewish pop), and consequentially the most degenerate city in the US.

Jews make up only 2% of the white population, and white countries are by far the most degenerate nations on planet earth. Have you considered that maybe it's the 98% of non-jewish white people creating the degeneracy?

Even if it were "te 2% evul jews" like you think, how fucking pathetic is it that a billion whites have been completely skullfucked by 0.2% of the global population.

There is no way that white people come out of this looking like a master race. Face it.

[–] • 0 pt

Its safe to ignore anyone who admits to being a degenerate. Satan has twisted your mind into accepting the queer lifestyle. Sad

[–] • 0 pt

I like to believe adolf escaped to new schwabenland

[–] • 5 pts

So many great men have warned us. It's insane how blind we've been.

[–] • 4 pts

FORD! almost makes me want to buy his cars but his family not even a part of it any more

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Henry II was kind of a fucking asshole too. Also what would I get a Mustang? Lol, this isn't GTA, I try to keep the pedestrian casualties to a minimum.

[–] • 0 pt

Ford is engineered by street shitters

[–] • 1 pt

Nobody ever learned from history, the same mistakes are made over and over.

[–] • 3 pts

All of the Abrahamic religions have messed up shit in their holy books, and a lot of Jews are atheists, so that's not a compelling argument.

I have three main issues with the Jewish conspiracy.

1) The premise relies on White people being weak, stupid, and pathetic for multiple generations. The plot says White people are not in control of our destinies and we lost control of our own governments to a tiny minority.

2) Most of the things that I see labled as attacks against America are things a majority of White people voted for and support. For example, multiculturalism. We could have stopped multiculturalism a long time ago if we didn't want it, but most of us did want, so we voted for it.

3) Ethnic and race based superiority or inferiority deny the existence of individuals. Jews do this, Blacks do that, etc. It's not just inaccurate, it's really lazy thinking.

[–] • 4 pts

The Jewish predilection towards, well, all the stuff is genetic and/or part of their culture. Whether they claim to believe in God is irrelevant. The Talmud is just a reflection of the culture. No one claims it's divinely inspired.

1) It is premised on white people being moral and industrious. The great feats of mankind are still white accomplishments. The Jewish achievement is collecting most of the world's gold. That money controls government is pretty obvious.

2) The people not directly vote on immigration which led to the supposed need for multiculturalism. Even the authors of the Hart-Cellar (sp?) Act claimed it would not change America's demographics. Whether they believed that, I do not know, but that is how it was sold.

3) I have to reason about people somehow. I can't know all of the billions of people in the world, so I have to notice patterns among groups of people. I'm not sure what this has to do with a conspiracy, however. The conspiracies allege that a small group of people is in control of most macro world events.

[–] • 2 pts

Genetic? I really don't think there's a gene for wanting White genocide. That seems absurd.

1) The major feats of the world were done by lots of different races. Surgery and medicine, base 10 numbering system and math, mining and metals, paper, ink, and printing, the compass and navigation, astronomy, music theory, and many other things were invented in Africa and Asia.

Jews came up with tons of scientific and technological advances, such as genetic engineering.

2) White Americans have known the results of immigration for decades, and most of us are cool with it, unless it's illegal.

3) I understand the convenience of discussing group trends and demographics, but when we turn this convenience into a hard belief we deny the existence of individuality. It's an extreme form of collectivism.

[–] • 3 pts

1) How do you think a conspiratorial view implies white weakness?

2) I couldn't find any polling on immigration broken down by race. I'd be interested to see what makes you think that whites are pro-immigration. If you go with Republicans vs Democrats, there's a split, such as here https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/11/12/americans-immigration-policy-priorities-divisions-between-and-within-the-two-parties/

3) It's individuals engaged in the conspiracy. The observation is that the players share a characteristic: ethnic Judaism

[–] • 1 pt

Who said that there was specific gene for wanting White genocide? Not me.

[–] • 3 pts

1) The premise relies on White people being weak, stupid, and pathetic for multiple generations. The plot says White people are not in control of our destinies and we lost control of our own governments to a tiny minority.

Have you had a look around?

2) Most of the things that I see labled as attacks against America are things a majority of White people voted for and support. For example, multiculturalism. We could have stopped multiculturalism a long time ago if we didn't want it, but most of us did want, so we voted for it.

No our 'elected' 'representatives' voted for it and now they 'represent' their imported voters. We didn't want multiculturalism, centralized power and industrial slavery, half the states literally left the union to avoid it.

3) Ethnic and race based superiority or inferiority deny the existence of individuals. Jews do this, Blacks do that, etc. It's not just inaccurate, it's really lazy thinking.

Social Justice killed the individual, it is us vs. them now, it's Weimerica. Liberty is dead, the bill of rights has been eroded to nothing, Kyle suffers for our complacency. Libertarians are too idealistic, too late, too powerless and too disorganized to fight commies.

[–] • 0 pt

1) Okay, you think White people are stupid and pathetic. I don't.

2) Your low opinion of White people might be what is giving you such a passive and victimized view of politics.

3) The only things that can kill human individuality is human extinction or technology that doesn't exist yet.

[–] • 5 pts

If I may speak for Pnut: 1) our country IS under the control of a tiny minority 2)our politicians ARE a bunch of traitorous useless sold out pieces of shit that need to be hung 3)you totally missed the point being made so I have to deduce that you are fucking retarded. We are in Weimar 2.0 and all this sjw/virtue signaling/ left wing mental diarrhea indoctrinating so many in this country has ABSOLUTELY created a bunch of stupid fucking lemmings

[–] • 4 pts (edited )

1) Okay, you think White people are stupid and pathetic. I don't.

More like complacent, misguided and 'over socialized' as Ted would say. We abide by the rule of law while our enemies subvert and ignore it. We have been convinced that childlessness is virtuous. That bohemian hippy culture is virtuous. That keeping your head down and being a good cog is virtuous. We have been lulled into a deep sleep of bread, circus and apathy... and yes when you replace the harsh reality of winter with socialism and Netflix and spill the blood of your strongest indiscriminately and en mass through mechanized warfare for over a century, weakness flourishes. I'm just as guilty of weakness as anyone else, sitting here trying to impotently type my way out of an inevitable gun fight.

2) Your low opinion of White people might be what is giving you such a passive and victimized view of politics.

No my opinion of democracy long term is what makes me jaded. The outlook is especially poor for a multicultural society, economically entwined and literally networked to the rest of the world (which is full of powers out to exploit/weaken us). The founders are being torn down and defamed, their ideology all but forgotten. Race radicals run unchecked through the streets looting and murdering in a media backed frenzy built on lies. We are literally having 3rd world style 'elections', our leaders are bought and paid for and/or blackmailed into submission by kiddy diddling Mossad agents. Our information is throttled and controlled by corporate and foreign interests. The republic is dead and power has been centralized and bureaucratized. We are being spied on, censored, crippled by taxes and barely clinging to our firearms. We are over extended like Rome before the fall. We are living under a mountain of debt and yet bread + circus continue just as in Rome... need I go on? Because I can.

"Governments, if they endure, always tend increasingly toward aristocratic forms. No government in history has been known to evade this pattern. And as the aristocracy develops, government tends more and more to act exclusively in the interests of the ruling class — whether that class be hereditary royalty, oligarchs of financial empires, or entrenched bureaucracy."

  • Politics as Repeat Phenomenon: Bene Gesserit Training Manual (Frank Herbert)

3) The only things that can kill human individuality is human extinction or technology that doesn't exist yet.

If you believe that you haven't read 1984, or failed to fully comprehend it. Individuality without liberty is simply torture. What good does autonomy, skeptisism or personal ideals do a eusocial insect? In that word individuality is transmuted directly into suffering, it is good for nothing else.

"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—for ever."

  • 1984 (George Orwell)
[–] • 2 pts

  1. Look around. A large percentage of straight white christian men have been cowered into silence by a constant barrage of accusations of being racist, sexist, toxic _____phobes if they don't adjust their speech and actions to the ever-changing list of things that are deemed offensive by Progs, who control our culture. If you don't comply, you're painted as a villain of society. You lose your job and as a result, probably your house and in some cases your wife and family too.

  2. Multiculturalism was forced on us, also by accusing anyone who spoke up about the problems of being racist. We were essentially hosts who were forced to adapt our house to guests, as opposed to the guests adapting, as they have in every other country for all of time.

  3. Social justice provides the mechanism (oppression and control) through which everything else that they want to do becomes possible.

[–] • 3 pts

Most of the things that I see labled as attacks against America are things a majority of White people voted for and support. For example, multiculturalism. We could have stopped multiculturalism a long time ago if we didn't want it, but most of us did want, so we voted for it.

That is a flat out lie. Show me where and when the people voted for multiculturalism.

Even those that do believe in it were brainwashed with the diversity is our strength propaganda campaign. All you have to do is look to the covid to see how effective propaganda is in getting people to act against their own best interests.

I hate liars

[–] • 0 pt

White people passed the Immigration Act. White people repeatedly vote for Republicans and Democrats, who are both pro immigration parties. If we didn't want multiculturalism we would have voted them all out generations ago.

[–] • 0 pt

That is not true, it was jews, jews are NOT white people

[–] • 0 pt

This guy scattered out his post throughout multiple different messages posted under different alts. That's why I'm not really addressing all of his points. He's trying make more work for me than necessary.

[–] • 0 pt

I only have one account. You've been in a echo chamber for too long.

[–] • 1 pt

2) Most of the things that I see labled as attacks against America are things a majority of White people voted for and support. For example, multiculturalism. We could have stopped multiculturalism a long time ago if we didn't want it, but most of us did want, so we voted for it.

Zero Americans voted for the 1965 Immigration Act, which is the basis of multiculturalism in America. It was both created and implemented, unilaterally, by kikes.

[–] • 0 pt

The Immigration Act was voted by a majority of White people in the house, and then a majority of White people in the Senate, and then signed into law by a White President. All of these people were voted in by White people.

[–] • 0 pt

Most of the people involved that you name weren't White, or were shabbos goys.

The vast majority of White voters hated it as soon as they heard about it, and shitskin immigration is unpopular to this day among a majority of Whites.

[–] • 1 pt

Denying the existence of groups is lazy thinking .

[–] • 0 pt

Do you believe in individuality?

[–] • 0 pt

Of course I do. We aren't the Borg.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I'm not a white nationalist, I'm just here for the free speech. What do you want to debate? I don't think there is a person on earth that doesn't understand (or at least suspect) that a relatively small group of very wealthy people rule the world and that most of them are Jewish. I do, but that doesn't mean I want to go off and only live around people that look like me, and I certainly don't support ANY sort of forced relocation of anyone else based on their ethnicity or religion or even political or social beliefs.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

To be real with ya I was hoping that some outraged liberal SJW, or perhaps a Jew that thinks he's smart would come forward and try to put me in my place. The sophist Jew is my preference for a good time though lol. The outraged SJW is usually just misinformed. I didn't so much want to debate the SJW as I much as I wanted to experiment with them. It's easy to show somebody facts and statistics and claim victory, but really it's a shallow and pointless victory if you can't win their hearts and minds. I don't seek to do this out of morality or anything of that nature. I do it as an exercise in psychology. I'm learning how to impart my message and have people accept it. Everybody is different, and so you can't take the same approach with everybody. You have to feel them out and profile them before you know what approach to take. This is why it's very important to have these debates over and over again with as many different types of people as possible. You'll gradually start to learn how to get through to different types of people. Trial and error is key and that's why experimentation is critical. It's hard to explain everything in detail, but essentially I'm just developing certain skills. Hard to explain....lol

[–] • 1 pt

I certainly don't support ANY sort of forced relocation of anyone else based on their ethnicity or religion or even political or social beliefs.

Ok, fine. What if we relocate instead?

What if we colonize the interior of Greenland or Antarctica?

Or what if we build O'Neil Cylinders in the asteroid belt, or floating cities in the clouds of Venus, or rotating 1G underground apartments on Mars?

Can we have our own civilization then?

When the usual suspects start sending "refugees" to us and we drop tactical nukes on the boats what would you say about that?

I hope it's just "they have the right to their own society".

[–] • 1 pt

https://files.catbox.moe/303a18.png What about this? Totally voluntary way to reward everyone who wants free stuff move forward witout the running us broke.

[–] • 0 pt

Luckily, Whites are no longer interested in relocating the invaders. Only extermination is on the menu now. They had their 109 chances, that's done with now.

[–] • 1 pt

Care to explain the differences and similarities Nationalism and Fascism?

[–] • 1 pt

Good question. It all depends of the implementation. It depends on rather it's forced or not. It depends on the willingness of the people to follow directives.. Nationalism and patriotism are also two different things. The lines can easily become blurred.

I mean any form of governance can be fascist. It all depends on how authoritarian the ruling party is, which is why I said it all comes down to implementation. I would say a nationalist government becomes fascist once it forces its people to be nationalists or once it starts acting as a dictatorship.

[–] • 0 pt

Do you believe Nationalism can work in a diverse society or would you consider that to be more along the lines of patriotism?

[–] • 1 pt

Patriotism and nationalism are almost interchangeable terms. Nationalism is defined as “the policy or doctrine of asserting the interests of one’s own nation viewed as separate from the interests of other nations".

Seeing as a multicultural society is comprised of people originating from foreign nation states their loyalty couldn't be counted upon as it would be divided between their host nation and their motherland. You can't reasonably depend on people to act against the interests of their homeland where they'd most likely still have a connection to the land. It creates a conflict of interest.

There's also the component of race and culture. Culture is the product of race. Race came before culture. It's our genes that mostly make us who we are. That's called biological determinism and it's what culture is generated from, at least to a large degree. What I'm getting at is this. A nation is defined by the way its people want to live. The way a people want to live is defined by their culture. The way we define culture is through race. If you mix and match too many races it'll eventually result in dysfunction as the different racial demographics will want to live their own way. It results in fractured and bulkinized nations where each group competes for their own interests and way of life.

The more genetically homogeneous a society is the more culturally homogenized it will be. Cultural unification is predicated on race.

When you mix everybody up we all have to fallback on the most basic cultural common denominators and it really dumbs down the common culture as well.

[–] • 1 pt

One of my first RPs was years ago when I noticed that if anyone questioned George Soros on anything, including which groups he donated millions of dollars to, what the purpose was, and why he used shell companies to do so, or pointed out the connections between those donations and the shady way he became mega wealthy (profiting off economic decline driven by chaos), you were called anti-semetic or a conspiracy theorist. Then I read a quote on another board that something to the effect of "If you want to know what true power looks like, look at who you aren't allowed to criticize and ask why." Then I realized, that they don't want anyone asking those questions because he's doing exactly what it looks like he's doing: Purposely sowing chaos in order to justify inserting leaders who will further his agenda (western decline), and becoming mega wealthy in the process.

[–] • 1 pt

Well said brother

[–] • 0 pt

Battle has been raging for thousands of years They are the Edomites

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Waste of time, stop debating enemies and get rid of them.

[–] • 0 pt

Wow, the infamous Amalek, voat troll legend. I see your incessant ranting about the jews is as determined as ever.

Load more (15 replies)