Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.0K

One speculation I saw (libs) about the veto was that the bill contains language and tightens regulations against the creation of shell companies, forcing them to disclose ownership. The writer suggested we watch and see if the senate attempts to alter the bill.

News about this may be overshadowed by Bernie Sanders’ filibuster attempt.

One speculation I saw (libs) about the veto was that the bill contains language and tightens regulations against the creation of shell companies, forcing them to disclose ownership. The writer suggested we watch and see if the senate attempts to alter the bill. News about this may be overshadowed by Bernie Sanders’ filibuster attempt.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (16).
[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

I heard the NDAA took away Trump's ability to enforce the Insurrection Act. Now he has to get approval through Congress.

[–] • -1 pt

You heard this?

[–] • 0 pt

H.Amdt. 833 (Escobar) to H.R. 6395(National Defense Authorization Bill): To require certifications be made to Congress when the President deploys active duty military within the United States during civil unrest by amending the Insurrection Act in Title 10, Chapter 13 of U.S. Code.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/116-2020/h141

https://www.congress.gov/amendment/116th-congress/house-amendment/833?r=16&s=a

The amendment was passed, but I cannot find anything related to it in the current draft of the NDAA.

[–] • -1 pt

Escobar’s amendment was dropped months ago, as and I were saying.