You're very good at selectively only answering the points you want...
That's what shills do.
Still on 0 case examples huh? LOL.
Nope. I've shown you them, you're refusing to read them.
No credit for partial answers, maggot! You've already embarrassed yourself by claiming the SCOTUS case was about fraud, go quote relevant filings showing the cases could reasonably bring fraud evidence and then show judges statements refusing to hear that evidence.
(post is archived)