I still contend it was about fraud, especially if you read the documents they submitted to the court, yes.
Edit: also, we aren't even getting into the cases dismissed by Wisconsin, Nevada, Sydney Powell, etc.. You're going to have to write a thesis to dismiss all of that and keep the cognitive dissonance straight in your head at this rate.
Edit: also, we aren't even getting into the cases dismissed by Wisconsin, Nevada, Sydney Powell, etc.. You're going to have to write a thesis to dismiss all of that and keep the cognitive dissonance straight in your head at this rate
Isn't one of those the one where Giuliani told a judge "This is not a fraud case"? Looks like you can't find a single example of a case where fraud evidence could have been presented but wasn't allowed by a judge LOL.
You're very good at selectively only answering the points you want...
That's what shills do.
Still on 0 case examples huh? LOL.
What part of "The constitutional issue is not whether voters committed fraud" are you having trouble understanding?
(post is archived)